User talk:Danimations2

Deletion discussion about Needlepeen

Hello Danimations2, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Needlepeen, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Needlepeen.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere^{(or here)_{(or here)^{(or here)}}} 00:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately your recent article has not been cited by independent reliable sources with significant coverage (see WP:42 and WP:GNG). — Insertcleverphrasehere^{(or here)_{(or here)^{(or here)}}} 00:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY and how do we stop that? Danimations2 (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello. Your recent edit to Internet band appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll confirm it Danimations2 (talk) 00:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bear in mind that you must find sufficient new sources to overcome the community's determination that the band is not notable, per the outcome of WP:Articles for deletion/Needlepeen. —C.Fred (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bear Danimations2 (talk) 20:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at SESAC, you may be blocked from editing. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i love you Danimations2 (talk) 02:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:181.117.200.19, you may be blocked from editing. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 19:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry dude ok, will not do again Danimations2 (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is still not OK to do this on you own talk page to change another comment to mean something different. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 20:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But you can remove comments from your own talk page, just not edit them to mean something different. Also, you can edit your own comments if it meets WP:TALK#REVISE. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 20:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kyle Rittenhouse have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — tony ^talk 23:19, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]