User talk:HannahDATAtab

This is HannahDATAtab's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: DATAtab (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DATAtab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback! I understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view and ensuring verifiability through independent, reliable sources. I will continue to work on my draft and my intention is to provide an informative and balanced article. I will revise the content to better align with Wikipedia's guidelines. HannahDATAtab (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HannahDATAtab! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello HannahDATAtab. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:DATAtab, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:HannahDATAtab. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=HannahDATAtab|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. It is mandatory that you make this disclosure as you are employed by the company. qcne (talk) 09:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello qcne! Thank you very much for your feedback! I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. DATAtab is a statistical software widely used for data analysis and research. Therefore, in my view it is essential to have a Wikipedia page to provide accurate and comprehensive information about it. HannahDATAtab (talk) 09:09, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HannahDATAtab. Please confirm, are you employed or in some other way contracted by DATAtab? Your username "HannahDATAtab" gives the impression you are? qcne (talk) 09:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi qcne! I can confirm that I am employed by DATAtab; however, I am writing this contribution voluntarily and without any directive or mandate from the company or financial compensation. My intention is to share informative content because I think the software should be listed in Wikipedia, as many other statstical software programs do. Please let me know if you need any further information. HannahDATAtab (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HannahDATAtab You absolutely do have a conflict of interest and you must make the proper disclosure. Please disclose as per WP:PAID immediately.

Also, are you writing these replies with the help of an AI chatbot? Please don't do that. qcne (talk) 09:39, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Qcne! Thanks for your reply! I just added a disclosure statement to my main user page. I hope that it is correct in this way. Regards, Hannah HannahDATAtab (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @HannahDATAtab, I've fixed that for you so it displays properly. qcne (talk) 11:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you for your support! Regards, Hannah HannahDATAtab (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DATAtab (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DATAtab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong thank you for our feedback! I will continue working on my submisson. Have a nice day. Regards, Hannah HannahDATAtab (talk) 09:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please write accurate edit summaries "Changes to sandbox made" it is NOT your sandbox it is a draft article. Theroadislong (talk) 08:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I will do so. Regards, Hannah HannahDATAtab (talk) 08:27, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Theroadislong, may I ask you a question about my article draft? Is it a good idea to add additional information from literature that explains things which are not directly about the software? eg. an explanaition of descrptive statistics from a statitics book? Or is it better to just add a link to another Wikipedia article about descriptice statistics? Thank you so much for your reply! Regards, Hannah HannahDATAtab (talk) 08:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @Theroadislong! I finished the revised version of my article draft and added several independent and reliable secondary sources that talk about DATAtab and about what in their opinion makes it worthy of note. Thank you for your feedback and support and kind regards, Hannah HannahDATAtab (talk) 08:58, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]