User talk:Jumpuy

Welcome!

Hello, Jumpuy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Introduction to Wikipedia | Tutorial
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, stop by and/or ask a question at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rubbish computer 02:05, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

August 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Today (Australian TV program). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 22:09, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Australia's Got Talent. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lightsout (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Today (Australian TV program). livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 23:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 12:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. slakr^\ talk / 03:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Today (Australian TV program) page, your edit caused a wikilink error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Australia's Got Talent

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Australia's Got Talent. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Lightsout (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Australia's Got Talent, you may be blocked from editing. Lightsout (talk) 22:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people

Hello. Regarding your addition of non-notable people to Weekend Today (Australian TV program), please read this from another user:

“

Lists of people must meet the criteria listed at WP:LISTPEOPLE. Articles have been protected to prevent these additions, and/or the editors in question blocked when they persistently continue to reinsert inappropriate material. If a name is included in the article in this way, it has to show that it's subject to meet WP:LISTPEOPLE. Just because because they worked at a station, or currently work at a station, doesn't mean they are notable. When it is discussed between multiple users, the end result is the same; the names that don't meet WP:LISTPEOPLE are removed. Also, Wikipedia is not a directory. See here, here, and here for previous discussions about this.

”

In other wards, do NOT add non-notable people. That is why I keep reverting your edits, as explained in my edit summaries. You also need to add sourced information, otherwise it will be deleted. Please stop adding these names until an article is created to establish their notability. Thanks. Corkythehornetfan 21:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Ryk72. Your recent edit to the page James Maloney (rugby league) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. By convention, we do not include information on future events; see WP:CRYSTALBALL. At this time, James Maloney still plays for the Roosters. We will update this to the Sharks when the next season starts. Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 23:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to James Maloney (rugby league). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Please discuss changes to the article on its Talk page Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 06:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at James Maloney (rugby league) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 07:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor / The Voice

We don't include years in the presenters and judges list in The X Factor and The Voice articles. See Template:Infobox television#Parameters where it says "Years and/or seasons should not be included" next to presenter and judges. Lightsout (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your disruptive edits to The X Factor, The Voice and Australia's Got Talent articles. The thread is User Jumpuy. Thank you. Lightsout (talk) 23:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing a collaborative encyclopedic requires a minimum of collaborative spirit. You have shown none of that in your refusal to discuss things but, most pressingly right now, you have shown no inclination to listen. So I have no choice to block you. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]