User talk:Nicknames03

Welcome!

Hello, Nicknames03! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started

Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset
How to: edit a page • upload an image

Getting Help

Policies and Guidelines

Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research
Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community

Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • Resolving disputes
Build consensus • Village pump
Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists
The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)

Things to do

Task Center • Be bold in editing
Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles
Join a WikiProject • Translating articles
Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism

Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Edward O. Wolcott

added a link pointing to Americana

Gian Lorenzo Bernini

added a link pointing to Italiana

John Joseph Montgomery

added a link pointing to Pioneer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 23:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Remsense 🌈 论 23:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tyotkino. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 17:43, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tyotkino, you may be blocked from editing. Mellk (talk) 17:48, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Glushkovo, Glushkovsky District, Kursk Oblast. Mellk (talk) 17:56, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Mellk (talk) 17:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hubert Pierlot, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please review WP:OVERLINK. Not every noun needs to be linked to another page! —Brigade Piron (talk) 12:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, I've now twice reverted you for OVERLINKing and come to your talk page to post about it here, too. And what I see is that you've been told about the issue repeatedly. I therefore ask you to stop right now with OVERLINKing. If you don't, I will stop you! This is your last warning. Schwede 66 02:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Nicknames03. Mellk (talk) 05:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll try to simplify this.

Let's say you've joined a soccer team. You want to help your team - of course you do! And instead of kicking the ball, you decide to pick it up in your hands and run with it towards the goal. Unfortunately that's not part of the rules of soccer, which were established a long time ago, and which every soccer player abides by.

In this case, you've joined Team Wikipedia. You want to help your team - of course you do! So you add a lot of internal links to Team Wikipedia's articles. Unfortunately that's not part of the rules of Wikipedia, which were established a long time ago, and which every Wikipedian abides by.

Does this go some way to explain why a lot of your contributions have been reverted?

Peter in Australia aka Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:05, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I urge you to pay attention to the advice from Shirt58; please come to ANI (the specific location is here) and pay attention to the community's concerns. It might be a bit frustrating, annoying, embarrassing even, but that is nothing to the frustration, annoyance, embarrassment of being blocked from editing if you do not respond ~ please don't regard this as a threat, by the way, i don't have the power to block nor would i if i did; it is simply an observation on what i have seen happen to editors who are outside the communitiy's norms and ignore any attempts to help them reach those norms ~ Lindsay^Hello 18:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Amakuru (talk) 11:01, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add to this, indefinite does not mean infinite and if you acknowledge the issues raised and commit to ending the overlinking which led to this article space block and contributing collaboratively to Wikipedia then it can be rescinded. You're also free to edit in talk space and other areas outside of articles. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 11:03, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]