User talk:Onel5969

Edit Count

• edit count

Wiki mark-up link

Hi! You might find these handy:

• Simple guide to Wikipedia mark-up
  • Advanced guide to Wiki mark-up

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 22:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Other useful links

• Special:New pages feed
• New pages sorted
• Stub Sort
• New Accounts
• Website Archive
• Cheatsheet
• Earwig's Copyvio tool
• Copypatrol copyvio tool
• Dabfix
• Dabsolver
• Dablink
• Dabs with missing entries
• Carbon dating the creation of web content (for checking for wiki mirrors)
• WorldCat
• Google Scholar profile
• WorldCat site
• Pending Changes
• G13 nominees
• Football Club History Database

Links for new editors

If you're leaving a question regarding an article you're attempting to get onto Wikipedia, here are some links you might find helpful:

• General notability criteria
• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to structure and layout your article
• On how to properly format your citations

New Articles Review Request

Hi @Onel5969, I had created new articles on few Indian villages, Some of them got reviewed, However below articles are in Unreviewed state from past 2 months, If possible, Please help to review them.

1. Lagumenahalli, Bengaluru East
2. Bendiganahalli, Bengaluru East
3. Raghuvanahalli, Bengaluru East
4. Kodigehalli, Bengaluru East

Thanks in advance. Have a great day! --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 10:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. I'm slogging through the backlog. Will be awhile before I get to articles this new. Right now, I'm in May 2024. Be patient. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi

Hello. You have redirected a fully sourced and notable article. The God Roog is a supreme creator whilst Koox is the god of the heavens and rain as stated in the article. Can you please undo your redirect? Thanks 2A00:23C7:E563:1700:1179:A2EB:522E:5205 (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, consensus is that this is simply an alternate name for the target article's subject. And nothing in the article suggests otherwise. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

I will re-edit the article myself. There was no consensus, that's the issue. And having read the Roog talkpage where the merger request was brought, it is quite clear that the two editors have a long standing feud, and that merger request was not brought in good faith. However, if yuou would allow me, I would re-edit the article. The deity Koox is not the same as Roog. Indeed, amongst the Saafi and Seex people, it is blasphemous to say that. Koox is the god of the heavens and rain, similar to the Yoruba goddess Ọya for example.2A00:23C7:E563:1700:B006:8129:3ABC:2B6E (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Brookfield

Hello Onel5969,

May I ask, respectfully, that you undo the redirect you made on the page Brookfield Asset Management? The claim that there is "not enough in-depth coverage" is incorrect. Mark Carney, the prime minister of Canada, was the company's chairman until two months ago, and given the Canadian election underway, Brookfield Asset Management is mentioned daily in the news. A quick search in Google news shows there are well over ten stories per day mentioning the company. If necessary, I can add a stub tag to the article. Tsc9i8 (talk) 00:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Please read WP:GNG to understand what notability means on WP. You need in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that something is notable. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:48, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

I have read that. And this topic has more than enough coverage from reliable sources. Tsc9i8 (talk) 02:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

I do not understand this deletion

.. or how the edit summary ("Back to last clean version") explains it. Can you help? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_from_Tucson,_Arizona&diff=prev&oldid=1283855543 184.153.21.19 (talk) 04:59, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Doctrine (mathematics)

I already said at an edit summary but why do you think references are unreliable? For example, William Lawvere is prominent in this particular field. So his reference should be quite reliable. Anyway, I welcome for you to make your case at the talkpage of the article. —- Taku (talk) 12:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Neither source is reliable. Please read WP:RS, wikis are not reliable sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:08, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Sources listed at Further reading are not references. I think you missed the reference section. —- Taku (talk) 12:10, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

No. Listing a book, is not a valid reference either. E.g. simply putting "Encyclopedia Brittanica" as a source doesn't qualify. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

That depends. For example, Lawvere‘s notes has the word “doctrines”. So it’s directly relevant to the article. Of course, we need to have more footnotes that give supports for specific statements, but saying references aren’t reliable is not right. Like I said, the tags you put are not applicable. If you have concerns about the notability, please explain that at the talkpage (as it is not clear why you think that). —- Taku (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, there are two sources which are unreliable, so that tag is quite apt. And there are zero in-depth sources listed, so GNG is not proven, making that tag apt as well. And as I said on the talk page, you're in violation of 4RR, so you might want to self-revert. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Well, your judgement on the reliability isn’t standard here in Wikipedia. For example, lecture notes by prominent mathematicians are frequently considered reliable and are used a lot. If you add tags wihout providing valid reasoning, then that is considered a disruptive editing and so such edits will obviously be reverted. —- Taku (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Actually, it's a pretty clear, see WP:USERG. And still you are in violation of WP:4RR. And this discussion is now over, since you seem to have a reticence to look at WP policy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

As I already said, sources listed at the References section (not Further reading) are not wiki. You seem to be confusing sources at References with the sources at Further reading. (So WP:USERG is not applicable.) As for 3RR, I reverted your edit three times so it’s within the rule. It seems it is you who are being confused. —- Taku (talk) 12:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, your reverts at 11:37, 12:03, 12:08, and 12:11. For most folks 1+1+1+1=4. And tagging an article for unreliable sources does not mean that all the sources are unreliable, but some are. Which is the case. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Miss Teen USA

Hi there, I'm (very) out of touch with policies around notability of late but I always thought the rule is whether notability can be established for an event not whether the current references support it? This gets especially tricky with older events with coverage hidden behind subscriptions like Newspapers.com. Why I ask is you redirected Miss Teen USA 1983 literally as I was working on it (although to be fair, you wouldn't have known that) but your contention that there is not enough in-depth coverage to support notability is clearly not born out by my subsequent edits. The same will be true for the others you redirected. The 1986 article was flat out deleted (I missed the PROD at the time) and I'll have to figure out where to go to get that one resurrected too. CJinoz (talk) 12:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. With those there were 2 questions, notability being one of them. There other was WP:VERIFY (apologies if I didn't put that in the edit summary). And redirecting as WP:ATD, is a normal way to deal with articles which do not have enough sourcing to show notability. That way, if sourcing is found, it can simply be reverted and the additional sourcing included. VERIFY is different. Any information which is not sourced can be removed at any time, and then WP:BURDEN applies. Hope that helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loai Al Fakir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GNG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Redundant biographies between two selected bios?

How do we deal with the near-verbatim repeated bios of Al Williamson in these parts?

Which do we keep for public display? Need advice.

Odla101010 (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Wow, don't really know. I don't deal with portals all that much. You might ask over at WP:TEAHOUSE, and someone there might be able to help you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Apologies

I restored the wrong version at Grande Boucle Féminine Internationale - my apologies. Thanks for fixing. Turini2 (talk) 17:12, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for reaching out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Planet X issue

I noticed you requested a deletion of my constructive edits in Planet X due to a supposed copyvio. Actually, the article was a split of Planets beyond Neptune and information of this article is from that article, not from a random Wordpress page. RealStanger43286 (Let's talk!) 15:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Ok. That would have been avoided if you had followed the appropriate policy (see WP:COPYWITHIN. Also, you should really start a discussion on the PbN page on whether or not to split. I've restored the long standing redirect until a discussion consensus is reached. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Ahmed Bin Abdulrahman Bin Uthman

Regarding your recent edit on the page, wouldn't it have been better to maintain the page and change the target page since this page is about the individual and not the clan? Solanif (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Nope. Since it was copy pasted from the target. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Spider Prod

Hi Onel5969, how are you?

Artist Ben Spider is prod. I have answered you in Talk:Ben_Spider. Thank you. Isolda (talk) 16:38, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Simply remove the prod template and say "See talk page" in your edit summary. That should suffice. Thanks for reaching out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Undid GNG tag

Hello! I recently reverted your edit at Pinkie Pie because I believe this subject meets WP:GNG. I've listed some reliable sources with significant coverage in the talk page Talk:Pinkie Pie. GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 23:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, but a couple of short blurbs don't do much for notability. The Feminism piece is the only one I would count as showing notability. Thesis papers rarely are used to establish notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Audio Engineer Nuccio Rinaldis

Hi Onel5969, Rinaldis has been for 30 years the trusted Audio engineer of the performer considered number 1 in the Italian music scene: Mina. He has worked alongside her on multiple studio singles and albums Hits, and Live concerts, including the singer's last performance captured in the Album Mina Live '78. I firmly believe that Nuccio Rinaldis' relevance in the music business can be considered unquestionable and that he is among the very few who have reached levels unattainable today. If you have no further objections, I'll remove the tags notice in the next few hours. Cheers, CoolJazz5 (talk) 23:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC) P.S. Rinaldis is in Italian musical history and beyond. The international successes for which he has been a key collaborator speak for themselves.

That all is well and good. However, that is not what constitutes notability on WP. What you need are several references, from independent, reliable sources, that go into depth about him. Right now you have none. The first is a primary source, and the second is a brief mention of him. Additionally, please read WP:VERIFY. Everything in the article must be accompanied by a reference which supports the information. Neither of the assertions made in your first two sentences are supported by the reference you cite. What you did is called WP:SYNTH, which is not allowed on WP. I hope this helps. This man was very accomplished, but we need in-depth articles about him to show he is notable. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Law Review GNG

Hi, just saw you wiped Western Journal on the basis of GNG. Not sure if that's proper - it had substantially more cites than even the other mainstream Canadian journals found here. See e.g. Queen's Law Journal McGill Law Journal University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review. I'm actually a bit at a loss because I can't see any of the journals at Category:Canadian law journals surviving under that standard. Ethamn (talk) 04:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Thatis not what constitutes notability on WP. What you need are several references, from independent, reliable sources, that go into depth about him. Right now you have one (the Canadian Lawyer piece). One or two more like that from independent, reliable sources should do the trick. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	A huge thank you for your consistent support and enthusiasm for my merge initiatives over the years! gidonb (talk) 03:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Meaningless statement

I was originally going to support your PROD of this, but because it was undeleted already, PROD is invalid. I "upgraded" it to AFD. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out. Sorry I missed the undeletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

The Owl of Minerva (journal)

Hi @Onel5969, you've already tagged the article for notability. It was PRODed before as well. So I took it to AfD to get a clear notability assessment. You can share your vote if you like. Xpander (talk) 09:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Steve Currie

What copyright violations are you on about? I only added references to reliable sources (four books about Bolan) to the existing text which had been converted to a redirect for lack of sources. Romomusicfan (talk) 19:49, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

The text from that Tumblr post was in previous versions of the article before the redirect for lack of sources. Why are not all earlier edits containing this material also being deleted?Romomusicfan (talk) 20:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Furthermore the copyright date on the Tumblr post dates from 2017. Text broadly similar to both the post and the most recent text appears in this article version from January 2015. Therefore the Tumblr post is a plagiarism of Wikipedia, NOT the other way around.Romomusicfan (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

In response to your question on Nthep's talkpage: You wait patiently. My priorities are not the same as your priorities. Feel free to restore your edits, but be aware that even with those edits, there is not enough significant coverage from independent sources to show that they meet WP:GNG, so it will most likely end up at AfD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I will refer them back to the person who originally created the redirects last year. They seemed happy with my similar work on Bill Legend and have not reverted or started an AfD on that. Romomusicfan (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Saltmarche

Dear Editor:

When you have a chance, could you look ar this article? Thank you, Joan Murray Joan arden murray (talk) 20:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Baisez-Moi

Hey dear editor thanks for all your edits the are appreciated a lot. Am contacting you for this article it is the same article as the article Tave you previously patrolled which was a redirect and was then converted to an article but was later converted to a redirect as I can see cause does not fit at the title Tave so now I created another article for the same subject Tave now at Baisez-Moi am just requesting if you can please, look through this article try helping to fix any errors and mark it as patrolled since you already marked it as patrolled at the previous redirect or title, thank you so much.🙏 Goodreadernow (talk) 02:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Well, there are three issues with it. First, it is not about his song, which may or may not be titled "Baisez-Moi" (there is no source which gives the name of any of his work other than "Fires". So it should be titled John Juest Jr . Second, you hijacked a long-standing redirect, which should be restored. Third, it does not look like he is notable yet. In going through the sources, there is not a single in-depth article about him from an independent, reliable source. Mone of the first 4 sources are reliable, and the last two are not about him at all. I've restored the redirect for now. If you wish to develop an article about the singer, I might suggest you create the article, with the appropriate title, in draft. I'd be more than willing to take a look at it and let you know when it is ready for mainspace. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Can you please check out the draft and see what I should fix I have added more references about him. Goodreadernow (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Puthalath Dinesan

I see that your speedy deletion nomination of Puthalath Dinesan has been declined. I don't think the reasons for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puthalath Dinesan have been adequately addressed, so I think deletion would be reasonable. However, I have to agree with the decline of the speedy deletion nomination, because there have been significant changes since that AfD discussion. You may like to take it to a second Articles for deletion discussion. JBW (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment. Most of my speedy G4s are simply procedural. Not having access to the deleted version, I leave that up to an admin to evaluate. Since it was declined, I then evaluate it for notability, sourcing, etc. This one seemed to be barely passable, so I marked it "reviewed". Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:32, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moncrieff_Williamson

Dear Editor:

Could you review this article? Many thanks, Joan Murray Joan arden murray (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for returning to NPP. After seeing you around more often at AfD, I checked your log...lo and behold, you're back! I just wanted to let you know that you're a legend and I really appreciate what you do, even if I sometimes !vote to keep your AfD noms :D –Toadspike [Talk] 20:50, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. Thought I'd give it another go. We'll see how long I last. And thank you for all your hard work at NPP and AfC, amongst others. And I never feel bad about folks !voting keep at an AfD I've started, as long is its based on policy. Which yours always are. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:34, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Bujeba page

Hello, I am a bit confused by what you mean by “notability”. I am the page creator, and I would like to know what exactly you are referring to. Also, I don’t think I ever had the page reviewed either. Could you possibly give it a review? Or have it reviewed for me? Or have it connected to a Wikidata? Thanks. Fdom5997 (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Do your due diligence.

You reverted my edits to a former redirect that is the result of a passed split proposal, which I had submitted a move request for, with the edit summary being just "what consensus?" - this clearly indicates you did not actually look at the page you were redirecting to with your revert, because the Split Proposal is still displayed at the top of the page, and it links directly to the discussion, which has received no opposition. This led to another page mover closing the request, because it appeared that there was nothing more than a redirect page, thanks to your revert.

In other words, you presumed fault despite not actually knowing.

Please take the time to look into things yourself. I understand you are doing high-volume work here, but that work becomes actively harmful if it cannot be considered reliable. Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Proper etiquette would be for the person making the change to mention where the consensus was, not leave it to someone else to have to search for it. No fault was implied, a question was simply asked. However, the term AWOL is an acronym. You incorrectly turned the page Awol into the article, which was clearly not the consensus. And please learn how to do things correctly, for doing them incorrectly is definitely harmful. Also, you might want to read WP:CIVIL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:58, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your actions

• Please respect Vietnam! READ Plan to arrange and merge administrative units in Vietnam 2024–2025 to know.

2401:D800:C3C:C448:6818:49CA:F704:621B (talk) 08:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Nike Campbell

Hello OneI5969,

Thank you for reviewing Nike Campbell a second time.

I would like to find out how the descriptive tags at the beginning of the article can be removed. The article has been edited multiple times to ensure it is not promotional. When compared with other Wiki articles of female Nigerian authors, such as Lola Shoneyin, Ukamaka Olisakwe, Molara Wood, etc., I believe it has a neutral point of view. Also, the subject is as notable as these listed authors.

What more can be done to ensure it is not nominated for deletion again and that the different header tags including the "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (April 2025)" is removed from the top of the page?

Would appreciate any guidance.

Thank you. Yourmmy (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Well, first of all, since you seem to have either a WP:COI or WP:UPE issue, you can stop editing the article. You also need to follow the instructions on those two pages to deal with the COI/UPE issue. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:24, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_K._Smith

Dear Editor:

One more to review. Thanks very much. Joan Joan arden murray (talk) 21:52, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Okay, here's the thing. Usually, when I review your articles, there isn't much of a question regarding notability. However, this time, there's not a single in-depth reference from a reliable, independent source. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

I had my doubts too but I didn't want to be unfair to women in a the scene was almost totally male-dominated. I can add one source. See if that helps. If not, you can tell me and I'll let it go if you would be kind enough to remove it. Thanks, JoanJoan arden murray (talk) 14:09, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

I wouldn't remove it. Another reviewer might deem it notable. She might be notable as per WP:AUTHOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Juest

Dear editor could you kindly look over my draft and see if it is yet ready for main space if it is can you please do me a favor to move to main space and then review it, thank you so much Nsibidi or Elûvian (talk) 01:47, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Note the article meets WP:ANYBIO, by meeting this criteria the subject of the article is considered notable, and also there is an Isindebele Wikipedia article at https://nr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juest. So I think it should be moved to main space then marked as patrolled, thank you so much for all your hard work. Nsibidi or Elûvian (talk) 02:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Tunisia national under-18 football team

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tunisia national under-18 football team, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Content on site is copied from Wikipedia (and attributed to Wikiepdia). Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:09, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I don't see the attribution in the page history, however. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:26, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

The external site copied From Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 23:26, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Notability of Nongnarong and Jaroensak

Hello, so according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts/Kickboxing task force#Guidelines a "kickboxing athlete is presumed notable if they've… prior to March 1, 2022… been a Lumpinee or Rajadamnern champion".

Am I mistaken to believe they don't pass due to this? Briantcraven (talk) 02:01, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Any help? Briantcraven (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

My bad, looked at the wrong SNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:53, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Notability issues and redirects

Hi there! It looks like tonight we are patrolling roughly the same vintage of articles in the feed... I'll click to the next article, see your notability tag, then while I searching for sources the next thing I see is it's been redirected. For at least three of them, I've found sources demonstrating their notability and re-tagged accordingly: Vincent Vosse, Alfred Oetker, Sev Sarmenta (the latter of which has solid coverage already in the article). Given what I've found, would you mind doing a bit of a WP:BEFORE before you WP:BLAR these pages? Finally, as you do BLAR pages, would you please consider notifying the page creators and adding notices to the target talk pages? Per WP:BLAR, It is good practice to notify the article creator or significant contributors using {{uw-blar}}. If other editors disagree with this blanking, its contents can be recovered from page history, as the article has not been deleted.... To make it easier for other editors to find the history of the blanked article, it's good practice to add a short notice using {{Blank and redirect notice}}, even if no content has been merged there. Considering some of these are being contested (by me), I think it would be good to notify the page creators. Thank you and happy patrolling! Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:59, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

+1, Sandesh Prabhudesai was WP:BLARed without any notification to me, the creator, only because of some problematic WP:NPOV language by an IP editor. Wikipedia is a collaborative space, and if you would like to delete an article, please nominate it to WP:AFD or gain consensus first. SerChevalerie (talk) 05:16, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Editors can disagree with constitutes notability. Your first two examples did not have enough in-depth coverage to show they had met WP:GNG. The third was a blatant case of WP:COI or WP:UPE editing. There are other articles which you have marked as "reviewed", even though they do not have a single in-depth source about them. But I respect your judgement. Thank you for all your hard work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

I don't mark a page as reviewed unless I've done a search and found sources, which I did in both cases where I reverted your BLAR. As for Sev Sarmenta, @SerChevalerie has just pointed out above that the page was fine before a COI IP editor came along. The whole article didn't need to be removed from mainspace; it just needed to have the COI content reverted. All I'm asking is that you notify page creators per the recommended practice when you BLAR a page. Thanks. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

My problem with the Sandesh article is not the IP editor, but there is a clear indication that Ser has a blatant coi/upe interest. Hence the entire article has that issue. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

If you believe there is COI/UPE going on, I would have assumed you would have brought your concerns directly to SerChevalerie and/or taken them to WP:COIN, but I don't see any such posts in the archives (perhaps I am missing something). Those are the steps that should be taken before airing accusations to third parties. I am not interested in hearing accusations of COI that have not been first aired in the appropriate channels. Bye. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

No worries. I always give editors a chance to come clean before I take them to COIN. Especially in such an obvious case as this. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

You do give them chance? why you are lying? Wh67890 (talk) 13:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Why hide 2024-25 Denmarks series ??

bring back "2024-25 Denmark series" it is a ongoing site whit weekly updates, as all others football legues around the world. Johnbp2 (talk) 07:05, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Anyone can "bring it back", but it requires reliable sourcing to do that. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Why you do this to every article. You are not going to take this one easy though because you hurt a scholar with mental fatigue to write an article. Wh67890 (talk) 13:53, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Waleed A. Alrodhan AfD issue

Hello,

I am somewhat curious, as this is my first challenge regarding AfD. Rewrite everything to maintain a neutral point of view. Let me know your thought.

By the way, I have noticed that many pages about living individuals in Saudi Arabia lack quality writing and do not seem to follow the guidelines.

GreenRedFlag (talk) 17:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

I have been monitoring this page closely. I noticed that two temporary users appeared briefly, made only a few edits—all on this page—and then contributed no further. This situation seems quite unusual. What do you suggest? GreenRedFlag (talk) 19:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

André Gibert

What do you think about this citation? Is it significant enough? Bearian (talk) 19:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm always of two minds about stuff like this. On the one hand, my heart says this type of citation from 100 years ago, in an age of print newspaper as virtually our only source of information, is worth 2,988 in-depth references from today's 24-hour news cycle from sites like MSNBC, Salon, Deadline, etc. On the other hand, I am constrained by the current policy. In the latter, your reference mentions the subject of the article 3 times, but all 3 times they are simple mentions. Being a former fighter pilot, I'd love for this to pass WP:GNG. By the way, I do not always agree with you, but respect the hell out of you. Not sure I answered your question. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Kanyakubja

I think must be moved to draft. --Altenmann >talk 19:01, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Deprodding of P. C. Solanki

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from P. C. Solanki, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!— Komodo (talk) 02:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

about some Grade A Tertiary Hospitals

I noticed that you believe Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin Medical University Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital, and Tianjin University Central Hospital do not meet the notability criteria, and have therefore redirected their entries. I would like to clarify that all of these institutions are Grade A Tertiary Hospitals, which represents the highest level of hospital accreditation by the Chinese government. They are non-profit public hospitals, not commercial entities, and each treats tens of thousands of patients annually.These hospitals each have a history spanning several decades.

Frankly, one of the reasons I focus on writing entries about major public hospitals is to counter the misleading effects of commercial promotion by smaller, for-profit institutions. The references cited in these entries are based on the most authoritative professional data sources that document local healthcare conditions. A simple search through Google or other search engines reveals a wealth of news coverage, online content, and books related to these hospitals—not to mention a substantial number of academic publications.

May I ask whether a thorough literature review was conducted before making the decision to redirect? Or was the judgment based merely on personal unfamiliarity? Such an approach is neither collegial nor aligned with the rigor and sense of responsibility that this kind of editorial work demands. Amazingloong (talk) 16:15, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

If you wish to write articles about these institutions, might I suggest that you include 2-3 in-depth references about them from independent, reliable sources in order to establish that they pass WP:GNG. That's pretty standard WP procedure. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:14, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

As always, a pleasure Gerda. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:40, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

De-proded Monument to the Great Victory of Yenangyaung

Hey Onel, FYI, I added one source to Monument to the Great Victory of Yenangyaung and did a partial merge to Battle of Yenangyaung, de-proding it in the process. Best, MarioGom (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, MarioGom. Appreciate it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Seeking feedback on proposed edits to Commvault

Hi @Onel5969! I noticed that you recently edited the lead section of the Commvault article. I’m reaching out because I’ve had a set of proposed edits to that same section waiting on the article’s Talk page for about three months, and I’m hoping you might be willing to take a look.

To be fully transparent, I’m a connected contributor with a declared conflict of interest, and I’ve added a COI tag to the article's Talk page. Because of that, I’m not editing the article directly, but I’ve tried to present suggested edits in line with Wikipedia’s sourcing and neutrality standards while also improving the accuracy of the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Commvault#Suggesting_Article_Improvements

If you have the time, I’d greatly appreciate your review and feedback on the proposals. Thanks for your consideration either way and for your work improving the article. SBCornelius (talk) 18:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Footballer redirects

Hello. I agree with you that there's a lot of non-notable footballer articles that need to be dealt with, but I want to suggest that, at least when you come across active players, you take them to AFD or PROD rather than redirect them to their current team. Most players move around from team to team, and thus redirecting to the one they're at currently can quickly become outdated and incorrect. If a modern footballer is truly non-notable, deletion is often the best route. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I always use redirect as an ATD if there is a valid target. Often, this is the only way to get folks to work on articles. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Please do not delete fledgling African wikipedia content.

You recently deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1992_Barkly_East_Branch_railway_accident&oldid=1290452593 , this is very unkind behaviour of a researched article from pre-internet African. Wikipedia has a severe lack of articles covering African events because of unkind actions like yours. The article is well researched, yes it currently has limited linked sources because of when the event happened, I have now tried to address it by requesting further references on the Talk page, I will follow up again. Africa doesn't have many online archives, South African Newspapers, magazines and Hansard [ZA] has articles of the event, but getting offline media takes time and is extremely difficult if it even still exists. I have spoken to people involved accident to create the article, but only sourced wikipedia acceptable reference. The accident was a major pivotal event in the fledgling private rail industry in South Africa. -- Firefishy (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

That's all well and good, I suggest you use the draftspace to work on articles with substandard sourcing. This will give you time to develop the article. Remember, sources do not have to be available online, simply provide enough information in your sourcing to show where the information came from. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Instead of following policy to call for improved sourcing you skipped standard procedure and rushed to delete the article. In my view is wikipedia is a hostile place for small contribution. -- Firefishy (talk) 13:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I've looked over the draft and I don't see a single action from User:Onel5969 which might draw complaint. On the other hand, statements here from User:Firefishy seem way out of place for an account registered in 2005. I would think that in twenty years of contributions, Firefishy might have learned to assume good faith and avoid personal characterizations towards other editors. Firefishy should know to build pages out of found reliable sources, not conversations with people involved accident to create the article which meets the very definition of WP:Original research. Trying to make this an "African" issue is an argument entirely failing AGF. Please go work on sourcing your draft, and leave this editor alone. BusterD (talk) 13:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Please review the correct history as per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1992_Barkly_East_Branch_railway_accident&oldid=1290452593 , the draft was only created after I restored the article, User:Onel5969 had initially removed the article stating WP:GNG. The same method was used to remove my article about the Polihali Dam https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polihali_Dam&diff=1222155935&oldid=1222047209 . -- Firefishy (talk) 14:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I read the correct page history before posting. AfD is a common method wikipedians use to remove article for subjects which don't meet thresholds like GNG or V. The process is disinterested in the outcome, unlike the page creator. Make arguments by sourcing your work, not unfairly complaining about wikipedians who happen to be doing theirs. (Btw, Polihali Dam has its own issues.) If you continue to post here I'll take this conversation to your talk page. BusterD (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, sorry my blood was high, it takes time to get enough detail for these articles and it is incredibly frustrating for someone from another continent to remove the article without any discussion. Feel free to move this discussion to my talk page if appropriate. The article was not removed by the standard AfD process which I believe has an process to appeal, it was removed by just replacing the article with a redirect. Moving the page to draft namespace was only after I restored the original article. On the talk page of the article I've already started a process to collect additional sources for the article. Pre-internet articles for African content are difficult, source material is thin, referencing acceptable Wikipedia sources is tough. -- Firefishy (talk) 14:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: New Zealand Militia

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of New Zealand Militia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: backwards copy - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Zealand_Militia&oldid=1249728066. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:40, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:42, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Ahau software

There is an AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahau (software)) for an article you PRODed. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:23, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

The Third Man (novel)

Dear OneI5969,

I noticed your reverted my page for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Man_(novel) to a redirection to the film. However, I created that page because that was the only novel by Graham Greene that was not covered in Wikipedia. You can see this 1) from the Graham Greene page itself, where it is listed among his novels and incorrectly linked to the film (the novel is not the same, the ending for instance is different), 2) from the pages existing in many other languages (French, Spanish, German, Galego, I was planning to write one in Italian), 3) from the 255 (!) editions in dozens of languages. I strongly believe that this novel deserves a Wikipedia page. Don't you? Would you like me to work on more citations? Thanks.

Lauretana1975 (talk) 12:59, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Nothing "deserves" a WP page. Do I think it should have one? Maybe. But you need to have enough in-depth sources from independent, reliable sources to show that it meets WP:GNG. In addition, everything on WP needs to pass WP:VERIFY, so you need sourcing to back up everything in the article. If you can do that, then yes, it's okay for the book to have a an article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:48, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Wait a minute.

You literally deleted a research based article that took an effort in few seconds. Are you really aware of what you are doing? I am mentally exhausted doing reasearch on it and you came and deleted it like it was some piece of garbage or dump. It took 18000+ characters. WP:Essay? From which sense it looks like an essay? And I would like to ask you "WP:Verify"? I mean i grinded myself to add citations and you came and said "Avada Kedavra wooh!".

Now, I dont care about how old, mad, strict or egofilled person you are but I am here as an independent writer not your "slave", I dont even know you nor care about you. Please, come at discussion and do a mercy on person who spent his time and energy into it and be a mature editor if you think you are. Wh67890 (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

And also I am not going to bother but why nobody grind you for such unaware action filled with attitude? This place is a toxic. Wh67890 (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

You really need to check your attitude at the door buddy. I have no idea what you are referring to by " I dont care about how old, mad, strict or egofilled person you are". You also alluded to something along the lines at Wikipedia:Help desk#Mentally fatigued, when you said "what they say "I am 1000 year old editor and I have voldemort stick of death" deleted the 18000 characters article". If you are going to resort to personal attacks, you should at least attempt to be accurate. I do not have anything more to add to the suggestions you've already received at the help desk. But unless you can be civil, please stay off my talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Who are you? Wh67890 (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

need your help

Dear Onel5969

The Article PolyAnalytik was deleted, I think based on your request, mention in this conversation @Liz as well.

Unfortunately, I didn’t have the chance to save a copy or contest the deletion in time. The topic is notable and supported by many global resources, and I’d like to preserve it.

Could you please advise on the best way to retrieve the article? Is there a way for you to recover it, or should I start rewriting it from scratch?

My goal is to retain the content and ensure it aligns with Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing guidelines. Any guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance Dina96 (talk) 16:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. I'm pinging Liz, who was the admin who deleted it. Based on the prod description, it sounds like I could have been the one, but I can't see the history. Probably the best option is to have it created in DRAFT, where you can work on it without interruption. My advice is to go through the WP:AFC process. Or if you want, once you feel it's ready to move to mainspace, ping me and I'll take a look. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Liz Onel5969 Can I request to retrieve it? where I can do that ? Dina96 (talk) 08:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

UTS 5 Speedy Deletion

Hi, UTS 5 was speedy deleted, but I disagree with the claim. It said it was a copyright violation of [1], but I visited that site, and it appears they copied their text from the Wikipedia article, they even have hyperlinks to Wikipedia and reflinks. In other words, they're the ones that took from Wikipedia, not the other way around, as claimed. poketape (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

I would reach out to the admin who deleted the page. It appeared to me that the entry on the other site predated your entry. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

It's a bit upsetting that you can tag an article, and without consulting me or doing any research, it gets deleted. That website is dated July 30, 2023. The former Wikipedia page UTS 5, which was created after that date, was created when I took the pre-existing text from a revision of Ultimate Tennis Showdown, which had been made on July 26, 2023. I'd at least appreciate if you owned your mistake. poketape (talk) 03:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

So what you're saying is that an article you created in 2024 was somehow copied a year before you created it? Wow, that's impressive. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:18, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

It seems like you're being purposefully obtuse. I stated that I took the text from Wikipedia's article to create a new article specifically for UTS 5. That text had existed on Wikipedia prior to the blog post. poketape (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. poketape (talk) 16:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

Many thanks for your reviews! Ctxz2323 (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

No worries. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Reverting my edits on Mandva

Why did you do that ? You actively removed information I will have to add in again now, and purposedully reverted the article to a state where it had less or no references and where it is not in keeping with the way articles on Princely States are presented.

Where is the map showing the location now on the article ? Where are the rulers of the state listed at present ? Where are the references giving numbers for population and extent ? Ummunmutamnag (talk) 14:59, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

As I said in my edit summary, what you did is called CUTANDPASTE. Which is not allowed on WP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:02, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

So how do I recreate the page exactly as I had made it, in it's much more improved state, while avoiding this so called CUTANDPASTE ? Because my version of the article was subjectively better and is made worse by your actions.

I was not able to move the article to it's proper new name because of a redirect that forces it's way back to a subsection of the old article.

So how do I fix that ? Because I AM restoring my version of the page in some way, let me assure you. Ummunmutamnag (talk) 15:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Also I was a bit high strung earlier, sorry. Still, the existence of the redirect actively got in the way of standarizing the article, and the information I added is missing as a result. Ummunmutamnag (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for the apology. I took another look at it, and I see what I did. When I rolled back the cut and paste portion of your edit, I went back too far, and undid your edits prior to the cut and paste. I've restored those now. Does it look okay to you? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks and yes. I only did this cause of the redirect getting in the way and I thought doing it this way was easier and would not have to have my request the redirect page be deleted.

I also got into an argument earlier today with someone else about what secondary and primary sources are.

I am seriously considering creating a page on the Gujarat Princely states to include all the tiny entities with just a few square miles. On the other hand we already have articles on these same states not made by me. I don't really know where to discuss the pros and cons wth someone who would have enough experience to weigh in. Ummunmutamnag (talk) 22:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

My advice would be to ask questions, rather than argue. Regarding Mandva/Mandwa, if you feel that the redirect is the correct title, then you should put in a request at WP:REQUESTMOVE, and state why you feel the article needs to be moved. This is to preserve WP:ATTRIBUTION. Regarding the Gujarat Princely states, that sounds like a fine idea. There are several pages about princely states already on the project, and I am not familiar with the history regarding these, but you might want to take a look at those and see how they might tie into your idea. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

WP:BURDEN possible article

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gor_Mahia_F.C.# 93.138.199.67 (talk) 03:33, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Jayeel Cornelio

He has been appointed a sub-cabinet official, so he almost certainly passes WP:NPOL. I deprodded it. If you wish, you may take the issue to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 04:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. Not sure that deputy level folks automatically pass NPOL. Will let it stand for a bit and see if another NPPer reviews it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Denmark U18 and U20 teams

Hi Onel, would absolutely love to touch base on your re-redirects back to Denmark national under-19 football team regarding the under-18 and under-20 team articles I rewrote and unredirected from U-19. First off, I understand and completely agree to any article that while we would love the coverage, it failing WP:GNG. You're absolutely right on the matter with these Denmark youth teams since nowhere else apart from DBU's website has coverage on them.

However I find this a little unfair, as the existing U-19 article isn't any different; it has only one source from Denmark's FA itself, whereas the U-18 and U-20 articles I rewrote had the same, except more references and more specific to each section; not just one reference leading to the main page of the team by DBU. I would rather we have each seperate team article so readers know how each team is distinct to each other and they all should supposedly stay up if the under-19 article itself still stands with it's one reference. FastCube (talk) 12:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I do not disagree with you regarding the U-19 article, but had not reviewed it. I have done so now and agree that it needs to be redirected for the time being, until enough in-depth sourcing from independent reliable sources to show it passes GNG. I've also changed the targets on the other 2 to the DFA page. What I can't imagine, with Europeans being so crazy about Football, that there isn't enough coverage out there. If European football interested me in the least, I'd do the research myself. If you want to work on them, feel free to undo my redirects (one at a time, please ). And put an {{inuse}} or {{construction}} on it to give you time to do the research without being disrupted. Or develop them in draft. You do very good work, and while I don't always agree with you, I always appreciate your efforts. If you do develop them, and would like me to take a look, feel free to ping me. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:21, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Straight line mission

Can you be more specific about which sources you believe are unreliable? The sources are all either articles from reputable sites or videos of the people doing the things mentioned in the article. WikiNukalito (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

YouTube is not a reliable source. No self-published, social media sources are (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I agree in general, though in this case they are videos of people doing the thing described. BBC/Guardian/news articles about them are basically just wrappers around the videos, so are hardly more 'reliable' in the colloquial sense, though you are right about the policy. I'll add more acceptable sources as I continue to edit the page, or others will. WikiNukalito (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Redirect reversion

Hello,

I recently came across this page: "The Third Man (novel)." I noticed you appropriately changed it back to a redirect [2]. There is no acceptable. sourcing for this subject. Anther editor came along and changed it back to an unacceptable article [3]. Before I saw the edit history I tagged the article. Now that I have seen tje edit history I am changing it back to a redirect. I will leave a note on both editors who reverted this page asking them not to change it back to an article . Hopefully, this will work. If it doesn't then further action might be needed, Regards, ---Steve Quinn (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. If it gets recreated as an article, and still does not include acceptable sourcing (as there might be sources unavailable on the internet which neither you nor I could find), then it should go to AfD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I just went over to User:Clarityfiend's talk page and both editors have already discussed the rationale for changing this to an article [4]. ClarityFriend suggested that WP:BOOKCRIT #5 makes the article acceptable by Wikipedia standards. Looking at the author's article on Wikipedia, it seems this could be a good rationale. Perhaps you would like to take a look and let me know what you think. Regards, ---Steve Quinn (talk) 17:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Hopefully I just fixed that link. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, missed this. Not sure this particular author would satisfy the "so historically significant" portion of that criteria. But they might, especially in light of his short-listing for the Nobel prize, back when it actually meant something. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:34, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Well, I couldn't resist trying to find sources for this article. It seems that I have had some success on JSTOR. So, I added one reference to the article. There is also this other reference which looks like a good candidate as an acceptable source. But I have only read the first two or three pages of that source, so it is not definitive just yet.

I left a note on the talk page of the article about these sources in case you are interested, Here is the link for that [5]. I may have found yet another one in a college database, but I haven't got to that one yet. It is looking good right now for this Wikipedia article. I'll keep you informed. Regards ---Steve Quinn (talk) 22:23, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

No undisclosed payments -- please advise?

Hi @Onel5969,

I see you reviewed my page about Tammy Faye Starlite and added a tag suggesting there might be "undisclosed payments." On my honor there wasn't a dime, no payola, and in fact I was just trying to bring a musician/comedian to light who was a Women in Red on other pages where every other performer had a page. The example I remember is the Luna Lounge page, where Tammy was the only person without a bio, and who, unlike many of the others, is still a performer, still appearing on major podcasts. So, as a less experienced but totally genuine Wikipedia editor, please tell me the process to appeal this. I feel really bummed about this, and in fact I quit trying with Wikipedia years ago because of similar issues — pages flagged or deleted and I just gave up. I don't want to give up, but I do want to understand what a person does here to clear this up. I also had help on this page from a professional Wikipedia Sherpa, so I thought it was good to go. Anyway, apologies for the long note but do let me know what to do as I'm itching to just hit the "undo" but I'm guessing that's not good form. Thanks. PaulieZiegfeld (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. No worries about the long message, and yes, "undo"-ing a coi/upe tag would definitely be bad form. But what is your relationship to the article's subject. If you did not receive payments, it's clear that you know the target, which while not upe would be WP:COI. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

OK so the tag is about payments, which did not happen, not CIO. But I don't think I have a conflict of interest. I'm not outing myself here, and I think that goes against the rules to ask it, but I have never been to the subject's house, for example. I have met them in real life a many times over many decades, but that is true of so many in the entertainment scene due to my work. I intentionally have not written articles about friends and family members who are notable just to avoid this. I also think the article is quite straightforward and took a lot of research. PaulieZiegfeld (talk) 22:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

That's the very definition of a conflict of interest. You need to take a look at WP:COI and make the appropriate declarations. I'll change the tag. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:08, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

OK. What fun. I hear you but also why editing Wikipedia is maybe not for me. If I've met someone in the world it's a CIO. OK. PaulieZiegfeld (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Ulul

An article that you have been involved in editing—Ulul—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Infrish 2 (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

An odd thank you.

I had just finished writing Spore drive this past weekend, and I went to add Template:Star Trek: Discovery to the article, and to add that article in turn to it. I noticed a particular character name was missing from the list, and thought: that seems odd. I went to add it, only to see it was a redirect. Your edit summary here from 2020 (being honest) kind of miffed me on a primordial nerd level:

"Zero real world notability"

Very much in progress, but the sources list... was deeper than I even expected: Saru (Star Trek: Discovery)

So if this becomes a Featured Article (which I intend), that's on you too. Thank you. Seriously--you flagged it for me as needing doing. Motivation comes from the oddest places. Cheers. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Politics of the Arizona Borderlands

An article that you have been involved in editing—Politics of the Arizona Borderlands—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Horse.staple (talk) 06:29, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Article Review

Hi, I added more independent sources to my article on NEFC (the soccer team, that was formerly a redirect page) I also believe Mass Soccer Clubs should be considered an independent source. it is a website run by a single person who writes about local teams. I cited them due to the relative lack of news coverage on the business dealings of youth soccer orgs in the US, which is unfortunate but the information provided is accurate. apart from finding and citing incorporation filings, I've not found a better source in my research. MishaQuinn (talk) 20:51, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Jackie Gonzaga

Good day, Onel! May I ask what I can do to restore the content of the article Jackie Gonzaga? I rewrote the article and provided many secondary independent sources that have significant coverage for the subject. - ArćRèv • talk 10:30, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

I am really confused because I think it passed the WP:BASIC; multiple independent sources (Daily Tribune, GMA Network, ABS-CBN, The Philippine Star, Inquirer, etc.) and if we combine can make significant notability for the subject. That's what I do. But why is it reverted? - ArćRèv • talk 10:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

"Notablility"

I know you're doing this to some of the pages I created so I got a question. Why even add that label when some of those pages have the notability to back it up? Kalahari Resorts & Conventions Wisconsin Dells was the first location in the Kalahari resorts chain, JCW Lunacy has essentially grown to become as important of a show as SlamTV!. I wish I could get more sources but the problem here is that with most Wikipedia editors who do this, they have a flawed and inconsistent view on sources and pages and sometimes the stuff that I have covered is often not covered by the media. Before you add a "notability" tag, please ask yourself "am I really doing a service here by preventing people from ever seeing articles because of my flawed logic and poor judgement?" Unknownuser45266 (talk) 01:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

The more important question is why am I wasting valuable time of other editors without fully understanding the concepts of notability, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and verifiability? If you do not have 2-3 references which go in-depth about the subject, which are from independent, reliable sources, then the GNG requirement is not met. So yes, I am doing a service to the project by keeping crap off of it. That being said, don't post on my talk page again. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Pedro Larrañaga

Hey, could you please delete Pedro Larrañaga, which is currently a redirect to Perico Larrañaga (a footballer), in order to make way for es:Pedro Larrañaga y Ruiz-Gómez, an actor that I'm currently working in? Luis7M (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not an admin. You need to make a request at WP:RFD. However, my suggestion would be to create a page entitled, Pedro Larrañaga y Ruiz-Gómez or, if you think the y Ruiz-Gomez is not necessary, Pedro Larrañaga (actor). Then I would turn the current redirect into a dab page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Deletion review for Urutau (3D Printable Firearm)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Urutau (3D Printable Firearm). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Superlincoln (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Matthew Lani draft

Greetings.

I request your advice. You recently moved the article of Matthew Lani to draft. Due to COI. I’ve noted that and put a disclaimer of the talk page of the article. Also I do believe Matthew should have an article in main space because he remains an active media personality and all citations on his article is verifiable. Also I see no editors objected to the article itself and its citations. So ive added a disclaimer and also moved the article back. I hope that’s okay.

look forward to your response Ashleyashville (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

COI editors should not move articles into mainspace. I'll move it back, and please submit it be reviewed through the AfC process. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I understand and do apologise. I’ve submitted it via AfC and I see it says waiting is 2 months or more. Just hoping it can be sooner. Since this Wikipedia was already indexed by Google and other external sources Ashleyashville (talk) 22:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

I know I am asking way too much and you already gave me too much of your time. Is it possible to review it via the AfC. Cos I see it says that they isn’t an order in which reviews happen.

also I don’t know if it might be conflict seeing you removed it from main space.

I’ll await your feedback and advise Ashleyashville (talk) 23:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your diligent work on reviewing newly created pages. Best Xpander (talk) 12:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Always a pleasure. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Vishal Yadav (actor)

Arguably he's notable as an actor due to second billing in a TV show. Would you mind if I smerge and redirect? Bearian (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Not at all, Bearian. It's always a pleasure interacting with you. Thanks for the heads up. I just didn't think a single notable role was enough. I was thinking of redirecting to the tv show as an AtD, but I'll let you take care of it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

additional WP:BURDEN parts?

Singapore Premier League (records/stats) 93.140.70.255 (talk) 03:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Mohsen Seifi

Hi dear friend

About proposed deletion of mohsen seifi article, This text was in the message.

“You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.”

I respectfully answered you on talk page when remove that and explained why you behaved like this again sir? You mentioned for deletion!!

An article that has been edited multiple times by multiple people. Alenmo1 (talk) 09:37, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

You created the article. It was moved to draft because it was deficient in showing that the player met WP:GNG. You moved it back without providing any in-depth sourcing. It was nominated for deletion, and while you gave your reasons on the talk page, none of those reasons are grounds for showing notability. And again, you chose not to add in-depth sourcing. In order for the article to remain, it needs several references which go in-depth about the player, and not just routine sports coverage, and they need to be from independent, reliable sources. Please read WP:GNG and WP:RS. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:41, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Sunset, Sunrise (1973) Draft

Hello. I have edited the Sunset, Sunrise (1973 film) draft to include more sources, and submitted the current draft for review. I wanted to let you know, and I also actually wanted to thank you for moving it back to draft. That forced me to find more sources and learn a lot more about the film and its creator. I've added what I consider to be quite a few sources, as well as a few extra sections (Plot and Release information). Hopefully these are quality changes & sources, and hopefully the article is approved. Thank you once again. Lairfans12 (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Yup. Nice job. Keep up the good work. Accepted into mainspace. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Daysam

Hi, did you happen to read my rationale for reversing the redirect before reverting my edit? --Ozan33Ankara (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Yes. And your rationale was irrelevant. Did you read my edit summary? I guess the answer's no, since if you had you would know why your redirect was not allowed on Wikipedia. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Petra Sörling

I just created Petra Sörling - would you mind taking a look at it? Seems an open and shut case to be reviewed. I was actually surprised she didn't already have an article. As a table tennis lover, it's an honor to create it for someone of her stature! MaskedSinger (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Onel5969! MaskedSinger (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

JaamSim

Hi, I've seen you removed the JaamSim page that I made to make sure it appeared in the list of OS DES software packages, for reasons I explained there already. I'd like to know what is required to keep the entry in the list, and if it is still required that there is a dedicated page then I'd like to know what is actually required for it to be kept. Thanks. Eteruel (talk) 18:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Saint-Joseph Boulevard (Gatineau) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint-Joseph Boulevard (Gatineau) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint-Joseph Boulevard (Gatineau) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:05, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Bifurcation?

About the articles Lucha libre and Professional wrestling in Mexico, I'll explain the DIFFERENCES before you answer me why you reverted the edits.

• The article "Lucha Libre" is about the version or type of wrestling that is practiced in Mexico and became popular in other countries, especially those with other types of wrestling (such as Japan, which has "puroresu" and English-speaking countries, which have "traditional wrestling"). In addition to the rules and characteristics of this TYPE OF PRO-WRESTLING STYLE.

• The article "Professional Wrestling in Mexico," unlike the first, covers the origins of professional wrestling in the country, existing or defunct promotions, Mexican wrestlers who have excelled in foreign promotions, and much more.

I saw that you had marked the copyright template... Wouldn't it be easier to remove paragraphs that were copyrighted instead of removing the entire article?

Respect to the both articles, in fact, this is the similar case of Japanese professional wrestling, which has an article dedicated to its wrestling style ("puroresu") and another covering the history of professional wrestling in that country (Professional wrestling in Japan) Ramaxel (talk) 01:35, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Lot to unpack here. First, because it's the easiest to answer is the copyvio issue. You are correct, I should have removed the offending paragraphs. I thought I had. However, the tag I placed on the article was to remove the historical record of the copyvio. You need to be careful of copyvio violations, as that is something that could get you blocked from editing if a pattern develops. Second, when you post on editor's talk page, please make sure you link to the page you wish to discuss. Third, I restored the long-standing redirect (had existed for 21 years prior to your edits. You have every right to disagree with that. However, there is also the issue of adding unverified information. Please read WP:BURDEN, as re-adding unsourced information is considered disruptive editing (see WP:DISRUPTSIGNS #2). Since the redirect was long-standing, I felt you should have opened a discussion regarding the creation of the article before creating the article. I noticed there was the beginning of a discussion back in 2018 on the article's talk page, but it seems to have fizzled out. However, all that being said, I think your arguments above for the creation of the new article are sound. However, please take the time to provide sourcing for the article. I'll take another look at the end of the week, and if they aren't cited, I'll remove them, which will only leave a stub article. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:29, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. I have informed you, as the OP didn't. Black Kite (talk) 07:34, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. Will take a look in a bit. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:31, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Request for clarification on Draft:Sunil Kaushik and Yuka Yokozawa

Hi Onel5969‬,

Thank you for reviewing the article Sunil Kaushik and Yuka Yokozawa and moving it to draft. I’d like to better understand what parts you felt were promotional or showed conflict of interest, so I can make appropriate changes.

I’m happy to revise the article to meet Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and sourcing. If there are specific phrases or sections that stood out to you, I’d really appreciate your guidance.

Thanks again for your time and help! Ikigai15 (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi. First, the entire piece reads like promotional brochure for the couple, so it's difficult to break out any single instance. However you engage in citebombing, which you should not do, please see WP:REFBOMB. Third, there are clear indications that you have a personal relationship with the article's subject. My advice is to use the WP:AFC process to hone your article into shape for publication. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Here is the link

Here is the link https://grammy.com/artists/zsuzsu-cook/40033 please not this individual has already passed WP:ANYBIO Problem solved now (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Cool, put that in the article and you're good to go.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:47, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

I already added it as one of the citations Problem solved now (talk) 12:03, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

I only need to move the article to Zsuzsu Cook Problem solved now (talk) 12:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Have to do some real world work right now, but I'll take care of that later today. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Problem solved now (talk) 12:11, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

MyWorld

Hi there! You undid my entire works on this topic[6]. The topic is notable and the last AfD was one year old and it is a separate entity so why it is still being redirected now? Please suggest. Thank you. --Neurtaisl (talk) 15:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

• I have reverted it in good-faith but if you still think I made a mistake then please let me know and I will self-revert. Thank you again. --Neurtaisl (talk) 17:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

PolyAnalytik restored

The page PolyAnalytik has been restored after its deletion was contested at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. As you nominated the article to be deleted via WP:PROD, you may wish to nominate it for a full deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. veko. (user | talk | contribs) 21:35, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

SM Neo Verde

Before deleting the page, may I ask to review the page, with a new source. This is a photographic evidence source that it is from a meeting from SM's hired construction company. Thank you. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10225086171375200&set=pcb.10225086223736509 SouthAdventurer (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Adding R with history

I was a bit surprised that this doesn't seem to have been brought up before, but when blanking and redirecting pages, could you also add {{R with history}} to the new redirect, per the guidance at WP:BLAR? Among other things, it will help users more easily identify redirects that were previously articles, which shouldn't be speedy deleted for maintenance reasons. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:07, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

C.C. Lambert Elementary School

If you don't mind, I was bold enough to redirect this defunct school's article to its district. Bearian (talk) 02:03, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Not at all. Redirect as ATD is always preferable. I don't remember this one, but I probably couldn't find a target. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:38, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

WP BURDEN parts

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Army_Engineers_Regiment_(Malaysia) 93.140.34.89 (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

KZLV

hello, im a new editer and KZLV was fine all the info was there I know it needs some stuff but it's enough info Jonacast8779 (talk) 21:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, not even close. First, you need to provide sourcing for anything you put on a page. To find out what qualifies as a reliable source, please see WP:RS. Second, several of those references need to be in-depth about the article's subject and come from independent, reliable sources, please see WP:GNG. Since you are new to WP, might I suggest that if you wish to create articles, you go through the WP:AFC process? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:06, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Golden State Killer (disambiguation)

Hello, I have deleted Golden State Killer (disambiguation) under G14 as Golden State Killer was retargeted to Joseph James DeAngelo. The disambiguation redirect therefore no longer targeted a disambiguation page. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Request for review of an Page

Hi when you have time , can you please take a look to page Vikena Kamenica to review? Thank you. Lanceloth345 (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

2025–26 Magyar Kupa moved to draftspace

My deeply respected and learned fellow editor! I see that you have put the article (2025–26 Magyar Kupa) what I created into draft. This is the article for the next season of the Hungarian domestic cup, by the way, this means that all Hungarian clubs' seasonal articles refer to it and now it is red everywhere. I would like this not to be the case and the article to be returned to normal article. What should I do about this? What caused it to be drafted? Thank you in advance for your answer! Best regards, Cakesam (talk) 11:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Simply provide 2-3 articles about the season, from independent, reliable sources. Once you do, ping me and I'll take another look. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I found 3 more references for the article. Please take a look and remove them from the draft if possible. Of course, as the series progresses, more and more references will be made in the future. :) Thanks! Regards, Cakesam (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Yup, that was enough to show notability. Moved back to mainspace. Nice job. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:51, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Could you please not redirect all my pages?

I do not understand why you are doing it. Supersumu (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Deletion review for Urutau (3D Printable Firearm)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Urutau (3D Printable Firearm). Because you have significantly edited this page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. (By "significantly edited", I mean that you have blanked-and-redirected it, presumably as part of your NPP activities.)—Alalch E. 16:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, but I really don't have an opinion on the article. My action was simply to enforce the results of a recent AfD. And thank you for your efforts at NPP as well. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:56, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotwali Model Thana, Barisal

Hello, Onel5969,

If you are seriously intending to do a bundled nomination of all 10 articles, you must notify the article creators for these articles. For the ones I checked, that step hadn't been done yet. Please take care of this as soon as you can. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Liz. All but two were by the same editor (the one which was notified for the first one on the list). The other two were by a different editor, who I have now alerted. You do not want me to bombard their talk pages with 9 (and 2) notices, do you? And my apologies, I though all 10 were by the same editor. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:49, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Akkazai

Please move this back to mainspace. WP:DRAFTOBJECT has already been asserted here. Nominate for deletion if you deem it necessary. ~Kvng (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry about that, missed the earlier draftification, and the usual warning did not come up when I used the draft tool. Have moved it back and nominated it. Thanks for pointing it out. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Šalitrena Cave

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Šalitrena Cave, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Source site is under a CC0 license per https://showcaves.com/english/TermsOfUse.html. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the head's up. Sorry I missed that. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:13, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Asserted copyvio at Wardley Street, Hong Kong

Hi,

You tagged Wardley Street, Hong Kong as a copyvio. The given source site is in Chinese. Using machine translation, I don't see anything at all that looks like it was copied. None of the content even looks like it is about Wardley St. Did you paste a wrong URL? -- Whpq (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi. This is what I got Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:16, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I guess I'm one of those wierdos who eyeballs things first. I pulled up the full post. This looks very much like an unattributed copy of the Wikipedia article. The post even includes "[quantify]" and "[clarification needed]" tags. -- Whpq (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:43, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Nexen

Hi, thanks for jumping in and fixing the bad links to Nexen. This DisamAssist tool seems very useful! 162 etc. (talk) 22:17, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Copyvio at at Special Campaign to Crack Down on Organized Crime and Eliminate Evil

Hi, I see you nominated Special Campaign to Crack Down on Organized Crime and Eliminate Evil for speedy deletion due to copyright infringement. I removed the copyrighted material checked with Earwig's Copyvio Detector. Would it be ok to remove the speedy deletion template? The Account 2 (talk) 11:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Sure, but thanks for letting me know. I'll mark it for a copyvio history cleanup. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, and sorry for any mess I might've caused. I'll be sure to be more careful next time. The Account 2 (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

No worries. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)