User talk:Paperbirch32
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Imagene! I noticed your contributions to User:Imagene and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 16:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
July 2025
[edit]
Your edit to Holy Family Catholic Church (Dayton, Ohio) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:31, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up and also reviewing my pages. I didn't realize this would be seen as straight up copyright infringement. Is there any way I can still refer to the article and explain its architecture in general terms instead of line by line from the article? In fact my line about the Infant of Prague was actually from myself and I am unsure why this was removed I assume by accident. I am still new to Wikipedia and learning the ropes.
- Thank you જ⁀➴ (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- The fragment about the Infant of Prague was removed because it was sourced not to a reliable source but to your interpretation of photos of the church, which is a form of original research. You would need to find a source to describe the statue of the Infant of Prague. The rest of it is near verbatim copying (see analysis here). You can refer to the article and summarize what it says, you just can't copy its words or paraphrase it too closely (see WP:CLOP). Hope this helps! Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2025 (UTC)