User talk:Planeandaquariumgeek

- SETTING MY RECORD STRAIGHT**

If anyone has any questions regarding my conduct, please leave them below and I will answer them the best I can.

Welcome

Hello, Planeandaquariumgeek, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Boeing F-15EX Eagle II did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed.

Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

Again, welcome -Fnlayson (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, United States Air Force, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at A380, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 21:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 20:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For persistent unsourced edits.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 20:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lockheed YF-12. BilCat (talk) 23:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Ivebeenhacked. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, TWA Flight 800, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 21:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anomic (Roblox game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anomic (Roblox game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

I just reverted your edit to Costco because you failed to cite a source. Claiming that you were unable to add a citation is not an adequate excuse for failing to add a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia is not a first publisher of original research. See core policy WP:NOR.

If you can't find a citation for that information, the proper approach to get that information onto WP would have been to photograph the old logo on that warehouse before it was repainted and upload that photo onto WP Commons under a Creative Commons license. If you didn't do that, it stays off WP for now. --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on San Bruno, California

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page San Bruno, California, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:29, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of current heads of state and government. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. TEMPO156 (talk) 07:57, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:25, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ZLEA _T\^C 10:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already saw Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration removed

I have removed your request for arbitration as it is a premature request that is not suitable for arbitration. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. For most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Noting that you have a currently-active discussion at ANI regarding this, this dispute will be resolved either there or one of the other forums listed at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Regards, Daniel (talk) 03:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 04:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So I need to make an emergency appeal, because I’m being accused of using an IP to continue reverts. I’m not, and matter of fact I thought you can’t even edit on an IP if you’re banned, so I went into sandbox to try and edit logged out and it said I was banned. I also want to explain where my erratic behavior likely came from: I’m on the autism spectrum, and am very sensitive to change because of that and tend to behave erratically (also known as a meltdown) when something triggers me. I think that’s what happened there and I want to talk to ZLEA with you as a mediator to explain what happened. (I also have a potential compromise in mind, which is that we simply put the specifications for other variants in the variants section and the specifications section is dedicated to the most popular variant) Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 21:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC) Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Take a few days to chill out and just not think about this. When you come back, either find something else to focus on, or find a way to express your opinions on this dispute calmly and civilly. This is a courtesy because I can tell you do care about building an encyclopedia. A second block regarding the same conduct will likely be indefinite. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 04:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So I need to make an emergency appeal, because I’m being accused of using an IP to continue reverts. I’m not, and matter of fact I thought you can’t even edit on an IP if you’re banned, so I went into sandbox to try and edit logged out and it said I was banned. I also want to explain where my erratic behavior likely came from: I’m on the autism spectrum, and am very sensitive to change because of that and tend to behave erratically (also known as a meltdown) when something triggers me. I think that’s what happened there and I want to talk to ZLEA with you as a mediator to explain what happened. (I also have a potential compromise in mind, which is that we simply put the specifications for other variants in the variants section and the specifications section is dedicated to the most popular variant) Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 21:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also requesting you notify ZLEA ASAP that I’m not using an IP (and legitimately can’t) because he’s seemingly escalating even further and I risk a indefinite block for this (and it’s something I didn’t do) Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have your talk page on my watchlist, and I'm obviously unconvinced. If you cannot handle change without having a "meltdown", as you call it, then Wikipedia probably isn't the place for you. Per WP:NOTTHERAPY, all editors must be able to perform the essential functions of working together in a constructive and collegial manner. Those who engage in disruptive or antisocial behavior may be blocked or banned, even if that behavior is partially or wholly caused by a disability. Except in extreme cases, editors are not blocked before problems have been patiently discussed. However, if disruptive behavior is not controlled, ultimately the community will protect the encyclopedia by restricting the editor's participation in the project. If you can demonstrate that you can behave yourself, I may be open to discussing some sort of compromise (I have already started that process with another editor). However, your proposed "compromise" is far more extreme and impractical than the previous table situation and extremely unencyclopedic. I will not discuss it further with you until your block is lifted. - ZLEA _T\^C 22:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m actually seeing a therapist 3 times a week, a occupational therapist twice a week and a psychiatrist once a week and I think that and the cocktail of medication I’m on would disagree with you saying I’m not getting treatment. I actually think that my proposal is decently reasonable but you seemingly don’t because for example some variants have different lengths (also could you show me the discussion you’re having on a compromise?) I honestly think unless mediation occurs we’re gonna go back and forth forever, and it seems like you’re dead set on me being indefinitely blocked. I legit don’t know how else to treat my condition and trust me, I want it to go away too. I hate it. Online communities are also a critical space for me, as since I’m partially mute thanks to my autism typing out my thoughts and fixing things helps me express myself. Sometimes fixing things to me can be heavily skewed though, so I want to make another proposal: Tamzin could monitor my activity, and if they feel that I might be disruptive they can step in. On the other hand i think that Wikimedia’s policies are very much ableist and in violation of the American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) and would be grounds for at minimum a lawsuit, but potentially a class action lawsuit since this has affected many people. Just pointing that out, because I don’t have the means to sue but others might. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, I'm not convinced the IP is you, and I've said as much at the SPI. I think there's a good chance it's you, but a good chance it's someone else, so I guess all I'll say is, if it is you, knock it off, and if it isn't you, hang tight and just let this block run its course.

On mental health, I've never been a big fan of "NOTTHERAPY". I don't disagree with all of it but it comes at things the wrong way. A few years ago I wrote my own essay, User:Tamzin/On mental health. I'd encourage you to take a look at it, and to consider what I say there before you return to editing. This block only runs 72 hours. Having had manic/psychotic symptoms at times in my life, I know it often takes more than 72 hours to mellow out after that. So if you're not back to baseline by the time you're unblocked, I'd really encourage you to stay away from Wikipedia for a bit, until you're confident you can engage without getting into this kind of conflict again. Because, again, if you return to the kinds of things you were saying, someone's probably going to block you indefinitely next time around. And I don't want that, and it seems like you don't want that either. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 02:18, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And please stop talking about suing people. If you want to sue Wikipedia, then that's your right, but using this platform to talk about it is against our policies. The only reason I'm not extending your block is because you haven't said the magic words of "I'm going to", but if you keep saying things like "would be grounds for at minimum a lawsuit", we're going to take that as a threat at some point. (Also, the ADA does not apply to Wikipedia as it is neither a government entity nor a business open to the public.) Please just focus on yourself here. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 02:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Basically the problem at this point is I want this to go into some kind of mediation but ZLEA is seemingly refusing. At this point as far as I’m concerned this is unresolvable assuming ZLEA refuses any outcome other than me being indefinitely blocked. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 03:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're taking a very hostile approach, so it's no wonder that on this volunteer project, another volunteer doesn't really want to engage when you're calling them names like "moron". I wouldn't want to either. There's a saying I've heard from friends in 12-step programs, "You can only clean up your side of the fence". Do you think you can clean up your side of the fence here and apologize for some of the things you've said? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 03:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See my problem is the fact that I’m not gonna apologize when it seems like ZLEA has no intention of reciprocating. If he’s willing to do so I’m willing to do so, but my problem here is that if you’re gonna take his side we’re done. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 03:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how apologies work, friend. They're not a transaction. Like I said, you can only clean up your side of the fence. But hey, you don't need to decide now. Take your remaining 61 hours, focus on something that isn't Wikipedia, and see how you feel when you get back. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 03:50, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need you to explain something else to Ravenswing: basically when I’m in a psychosis/meltdown I tend to believe bizarre things, and I believe that the threat of fees may have had to do with my reading the Wikipedia article on the sovereign citizen movement and not being in a state to realize how insane it is. I have 0 intention of charging you guys anything. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I won't reiterate all the sound advice and warnings Tamzin and others have given you. But I will say this: to the degree that you have a condition that prevents you from editing Wikipedia while complying with our civility policies, you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. We're neither mindreaders, physicians or therapists, and we have no idea whether you're cold sober serious or not. As is inevitable with such a large base, many Wikipedia editors have medical or psychological conditions which impact their lives to one degree or another. And they are each and every one of them expected to comply with civility policies all the same. No one gets a Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free pass. Tamzin's essay is well worth reading, and I hope you do so. Ravenswing 04:57, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SETTING MY RECORD STRAIGHT

If anyone has any questions regarding my conduct/misconduct leave them here and I’ll answer them. Planeandaquariumgeek (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]