User talk:Prober90

Welcome!

Hi Prober90! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! stwalkerster (talk) 17:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I appreciate your assistance Prober90 (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Aboutorab Naficy. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the explanation and thanks for guiding me. Prober90 (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your ipblock-exempt right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 17:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked (which you can test by trying to edit when logged-out), please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Abecedare (talk) 06:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please do not respond to trollish provocations in kind, as happened in this discussion. Abecedare (talk) 06:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for the information. Prober90 (talk) 11:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thanks for your information Jun9992 (talk) 13:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Prober90 (talk) 13:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Norman Musa, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 23:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for letting me know. Prober90 (talk) 07:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as 2025 India-Pakistan conflict for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. making remarks which are sometimes subtle remarks for one side that is not NPOV. It further leads to an argument rather than discussion. We must remain civil and not pass subtle remarks about any side directly when it is not the discussion either. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Prober90! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to report users, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]