User talk:Realjjfrosh

Realjjfrosh moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Realjjfrosh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and This is not written in the manner Wikipedia expects nor requires. When you use references you need to use them to cite facts about the subject Just saying "An article in Foo states Bar" is not writing a Wikipedia article. This requires a total rewrite to be acceptable, otherwise it is WP:ADMASQ. Please read and apply what you learn in HELP:YFA when you rewrite this. and please try submitting it for review. That would have avoiding this being moved to Draft: space. What oyu have written is a paean of praise, not an article.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 06:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Realjjfrosh (May 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: WP:ADMASQ, zero independent sources, no real indication of notability, and written in a promotional tone; reviewer comments have been ignored

bonadea contributions talk 08:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Realjjfrosh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 08:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Realjjfrosh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Realjjfrosh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:36, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peller (streamer), you may be blocked from editing. See this diff. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me create my own page ? Realjjfrosh (talk) 00:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Realjjfrosh. Please first carefully read WP:COISELF, then if you would still like to proceed: visit, carefully read, and follow the guidance at WP:AFC. Of particular note is that a person must meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines to be fit for inclusion. If the notability guidelines are not met then do not write an article.

If you have any questions please visit the Teahouse where many experienced editors can assist you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for the response.

But I'm already notable i have more than 6 Articles from the independent source 🙏

Kindly help me please, my name is Realjjfrosh Realjjfrosh (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I should have read your talk page more closely. As you were informed here your article was rejected with prejudice from the Articles for Creation process, and you were provided reasons as to why which indicated problems with notability, neutrality, and unresponsiveness to feedback. Within that message there was also a link to click if you had any more questions labeled "Articles for creation help desk". fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me Realjjfrosh (talk) 01:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What would help look like to you? fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 01:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing comments and notices from your draft

Your draft has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. There is no reason to keep working on it. Please stop messing with the notices and comments at the top. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Realjjfrosh 2 (June 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Draft:Realjjfrosh.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Draft:Realjjfrosh 2, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Draft was already rejected under a different name. Stop submitting this as it is becoming disruptive. CNMall41 (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Asilvering. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. asilvering (talk) 03:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback Asilvering. I understand the importance of neutrality and proper formatting on Wikipedia. I’ve only tried to share reliable sources and will leave the rest to experienced editors to handle. I appreciate any help or guidance on improving this correctly. Cheers. Realjjfrosh (talk) 03:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]