User talk:Sandbox for user warnings

WP:UWSB

To all users: Please feel free to leave any warnings or notices here, or to use this page as you would any other sandbox. If possible, consider reverting or undoing your own edits, especially if adding a template that categorizes this page (such as an indefinite block notice).

This is useful for performing tests using tools (such as Huggle, Twinkle, RedWarn or Ultraviolet), which will only issue a user notice on a user's page. Please do not use this page to test advance reporting and vetting (ARV), speedy deletion (CSD), nominate for deletion (XFD), or request page protection (RPP), as these notify administrators. Also, please do not test Unlink, as this will make this sandbox useless.

Note: Please do not report this user to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism based on the warnings which you may see here, since they are merely tests. (Check this user's contributions.)

Please leave this explanation in place, and perform your test edits below.

Clean Sandbox

Other user talk test pages:

Sandbox for user warnings (registered user)
192.0.2.16 (IPv4 address)
2001:db8:10::1 (IPv6 address)

It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publicly and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behavior, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Main Page. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at the Main Page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Anyway, have a nice day!

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been blocked for a period of 2000 years for abuse of editing privileges at the Main Page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. (Providing you are still alive then.)

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{please block me|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

May 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at e. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. something test The Sophocrat (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. I don't know how to make this text not in italics. Whatevs. The Sophocrat (talk) 22:51, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at Jimmy Wales, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 06:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at the Main Page shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 06:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although every user is expected to be civil, it seems that you are being too friendly. Please use Jimbo Wales' user page for any test "friendliness" you might have, and our guideline to when you have to be serious, even when sleeping. Thank you. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 06:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC) [reply]