User talk:Thebiguglyalien

Welcome to the alien's nest.

• If you seek wisdom, you have likely come to the wrong place, but I will do my best.
• If you come with insults or put-downs, at least make them clever.
• If I haven't replied in 48 hours, either I forgot or I assumed you didn't want a reply.
• Talk page stalkers are welcome. The vast majority are not abducted or eaten.

1221 days since the last alien abduction.

---

Your GA nomination of If This Be My Destiny...!

The article If This Be My Destiny...! you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:If This Be My Destiny...! and Talk:If This Be My Destiny...!/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of If This Be My Destiny...!

The article If This Be My Destiny...! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:If This Be My Destiny...! for comments about the article, and Talk:If This Be My Destiny...!/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fox in Socks

The article Fox in Socks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fox in Socks for comments about the article, and Talk:Fox in Socks/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RFNirmala -- RFNirmala (talk) 00:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Centre-right politics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Centre-right politics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 14:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grace Coolidge

The article Grace Coolidge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grace Coolidge and Talk:Grace Coolidge/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 23:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dewey–Stassen debate

The article Dewey–Stassen debate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dewey–Stassen debate for comments about the article, and Talk:Dewey–Stassen debate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 02:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grace Coolidge

The article Grace Coolidge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grace Coolidge for comments about the article, and Talk:Grace Coolidge/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 11:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Centre-right politics

The article Centre-right politics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Centre-right politics and Talk:Centre-right politics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Centre-right politics

The article Centre-right politics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Centre-right politics for comments about the article, and Talk:Centre-right politics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kgabo Commission

The article Kgabo Commission you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kgabo Commission for comments about the article, and Talk:Kgabo Commission/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spookyaki -- Spookyaki (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Nice work. There's a personal tale between the lines there for Mmusi. CMD (talk) 06:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Centrism

The article Centrism you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Centrism for comments about the article, and Talk:Centrism/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1994 Kiribati presidential election

The article 1994 Kiribati presidential election you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1994 Kiribati presidential election for comments about the article, and Talk:1994 Kiribati presidential election/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Queen of Hearts -- Queen of Hearts (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Question from Cryptosystem on User:Cryptosystem (15:51, 7 March 2025)

Am cryptocurrency expect how can I find business partner here --Cryptosystem (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Cryptosystem. Wikipedia is not a social networking site or a place to conduct business. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:50, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

ok Sir/Madam I am sorry

I need help to

knew more about This big application? Cryptosystem (talk) 07:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't understand the question. I can't help you with anything related to cryptocurrency or business partners. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 08:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Cat in the Hat Comes Back

The article The Cat in the Hat Comes Back you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Cat in the Hat Comes Back for comments about the article, and Talk:The Cat in the Hat Comes Back/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 02:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for RFC Closure!

Thank you for closing the RfC at WT:FILM. Just a quick note that you may have forgotten to sign it? Thanks again! DonIago (talk) 02:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, glad I could help! And yes, I read it over several times before I posted so naturally I forgot the most basic part. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Question from Doverbear (02:32, 1 April 2025)

I want to add a new word to Wikipedia. How do I do that? --Doverbear (talk) 02:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Doverbear, it depends what you mean by that. Do you want to add things to a page on Wikipedia? Do you want to add a new page about a separate topic? Or do you have a single word that you want to put somewhere? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

I've created a word and would like to add it with my own definition 2001:56A:6FF4:1D2:8CF0:5931:2A1A:166C (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Now I'm curious! Why do you want to do this? What is the word? What reliable sources use this word? Where would you want to use it here? Is this an April Fool's Day joke? See WP:Neologism. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

You might want to pitch your word to Merriam-Webster before you add it here. - _Ɔ\^ꓕ ⱯƎꓶZ 16:57, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Tag on Dahl article in regard to revisions

Is it still needed? And for how long? I don't think many (or perhaps any) will disagree with your proposal and that the sub article was excessive. The children's fiction section in the main article covers the revision controversy although maybe a couple of examples of the revisions could be added. Gabriella MNT (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Merging has the details about how the whole process works. The tag sorts it into the category of articles to be merged, where it should be until the merge is complete. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 15:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

It would appear there is no consensus to remove it (which surprised me). Any objections to me going ahead and linking the sub article as well as adding a couple of examples of revisions to his children's books to the main article? Gabriella MNT (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Gabriella MNT, we don't need to be messing with things while the discussion is ongoing. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

GA review opportunity

Hi Thebiguglyalien, per User:Thebiguglyalien/Articles per country I thought I'd let you know I've nominated Talk:States and federal territories of Malaysia. I'm happy to let it sit for a few months or so, but thought I'd let you know as I'm a big supporter of that ambitious table. I've had vague plans on my mind for a few months to somewhat imitate it for DYKs, which has already prompted a few shifts of priority. I reckon I might go for each Malaysian state for the Administrative divisions and territories bonus challenges before trying to go for the United States though. Best, CMD (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from E34556 (05:01, 7 April 2025)

Hello how do I create a citation --E34556 (talk) 05:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello E34556! First you have to find the source that you're using to add information to an article. Once you've used your source, there should be a button that says " Cite", which will let you fill in the details about what source you used. I suggest looking at the tutorial if you've never edited before. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 05:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for your help with getting Veiqia to FA Lajmmoore (talk) 09:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

NYT

Actually, you do have access to the NYT, via the Wikipedia Library. It's in Proquest. DS (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

"This Man... This Monster!"

What is there left to say? Your work on all these comic book-related articles is just amazing. Funnily enough, although I've never actually read the Fantastic Four comics, I distinctly remember the cover of this issue. I think it was from that magazine Marvel published in the 2000s where each issue focused on a different character, alongside an associated figure. I think issue #2 or #3 focused on Ben Grimm, which might be where I've seen that.

Anyway, before the GA review starts by someone (unless I end up snatching it, lol) something I wanted to note is that although the lede and infobox give the issue's publication date as June 1966, this isn't mentioned anywhere in the main body. Also, while the main body does acknowledge Stan Lee as the story's writer, his role as the editor isn't acknowledged anywhere outside the infobox; not something major, but it is there. Lastly, I noticed that the infobox image is quite word out and gray-ish. Have you considered replacing it with the one from the Marvel Wiki? Seems like the one used on Wikipedia isn't even the full image, but a crop. PanagiotisZois (talk) 10:52, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! I agree that the digitized version at the Marvel Wiki is better and probably should be switched, though I don't know if there are any non-free use considerations here. Thanks for catching the publication date, I've fixed that now. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey, it's true that your work is great! As for the image, I don't think there's much to consider. I mean, Wikipedia automatically resizes non-free images, so there's that, if that is what you were referring to. I moved the publication date at the beginning of the paragraph, so that it directly ties into the issue's number and creative team information, though I'm not sure about the wording. If you don't like it, feel free to change it. PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Pinaddel (14:14, 10 April 2025)

Hello. How do you know that your edit is good. Are there any reviews --Pinaddel (talk) 14:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Pinaddel! There are many people who watch new edits as they come in or keep their eye on specific articles, but each edit is not individually reviewed. If you're ever not sure about an edit, you can always ask for feeback at the Teahouse. I notice that your edit to USS Worcester (CL-144) added some grammar issues into the article and made it incorrect. To make a good edit, you'll want to look it over before publishing to make sure that everything looks how it's supposed to. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 16:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

ANI

As I have linked to one of your diffs, you might be interested in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Das osmnezz topic ban. GiantSnowman 06:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Murremannen (17:04, 15 April 2025)

Hey, The Big Ugly Alien!

Hope all is well. Great to have you as my mentor.

I've completed my first two wiki edits. I fixed one dead link and updated the tone of a flagged article to be more natural.

Before I make any more edits, it would be helpful to know that I'm following the correct guidelines and doing everything according to the book.

All the best! --Murremannen (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Murremannen Looks good! These sort of fixes are super helpful and we could definitely use more people on this sort of thing. I removed the maintenance tag since it looks like the problem has been fixed. You can feel free to remove the tags during your edits if you've fixed what it's referring to. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

GA reviews

I see that you do reviews per the country of the article, so I thought that I'd let you know about the current articles from Yemen that need to be reviewed. Or if you want you can wait for me to be done with South Yemen so you can review it 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Nhial Reath Nyuon (14:37, 16 April 2025)

Hi, how can I create my career achievements? --Nhial Reath Nyuon (talk) 14:37, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Nhial Reath Nyuon, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on what independent sources say about a subject, and you cannot add your own career achievements. Let me know if you need help adding anything that you have no professional connection with. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from HarrocksHLA (13:40, 19 April 2025)

Heya! I am a teacher and tutor. Can you please tell me how I can EMBED an article to something? --HarrocksHLA (talk) 13:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I do not know how to do this! But your assigned mentor can help you! 2605:A601:909E:1100:BD31:2883:E52E:8880 (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

It's hard to say without knowing what you want to embed the article to or what you want to do with it. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from IuseArchBTW8 (07:34, 23 April 2025)

Hello, tell please, how to create an article? --IuseArchBTW8 (talk) 07:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello IuseArchBTW8! You can follow the instructions at Help:Your first article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 16:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Promotion of Grace Coolidge

Congratulations, Thebiguglyalien! The article you nominated, Grace Coolidge, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Question from Herohcreatives (16:53, 28 April 2025)

Hello, I will be publishing my first article on the wiki soon. Is there anything I need to know to deliver a successful article that will meet the guidelines? --Herohcreatives (talk) 16:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Herohcreatives, does the article have sources that meet the requirements listed at WP:42? The most important thing is that all of the information is based on reliable sources, and that these sources prove that the subject meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. If you think it does, then you can use the article wizard to get started with the publishing process and I can take a look at it for you. The other important thing is whether you have a connection with the article's subject. If you're being paid to write the article or if it's about something you're personally involved with, you might have to disclose that. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Thebiguglyalien for your reply. Yes the two articles met with the requirement to my possible knowledge. Also, I am personally involved with the two subjects. Both of them have impacted my life and they have played a prominent role in the Academic environment both home and abroad. Therefore, no money is involved. As a matter of fact I am using this to build a portfolio in Wikipedia as I am planning to choose the path of a Wikipedia writer. I am a graphic designer and I do layout for academic journals.

I am still doing the necessary things to get started on Wikipedia; editing and contributing to previous articles....once that is done I will commence writing and get it across to you for your input. Herohcreatives (talk) 07:37, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,233 round points from 24 good articles, 28 Did you know articles, and one In the news nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplier featured articles on Black Widow (Natasha Romanova) and Grace Coolidge, in addition to two GAs and two reviews
• History6042 (submissions) with 1,088 round points from four featured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and a good topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
• Arconning (submissions) with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Barbara Bush

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 8 June 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Wehwalt (talk) 11:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Ardo Hansson

On 2 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ardo Hansson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ardo Hansson was appointed to the committee overseeing the transition from the Soviet ruble to the Estonian kroon as a replacement for someone who fell ill? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ardo Hansson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ardo Hansson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Promotion of Barbara Park bibliography

Congratulations, Thebiguglyalien! The list you nominated, Barbara Park bibliography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Question from OmegaAndromedae (03:10, 2 May 2025)

Hello! I would like to ask, how to make a reference? I use source and I'm confused since I don't really get it --OmegaAndromedae (talk) 03:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

OmegaAndromedae, the simplest way is to type <ref>your reference</ref>. The most important thing is that you have the basic info like the title, the author, the date, the publisher, and anything else that might be relevant. That's really all you need to worry about. A lot of editors like to use citation templates, where you add something like <ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |date= |title= |url= |website= |publisher= |access-date=}}</ref> and then fill in the parameters for each part. Then it formats it automatically. You can practice in your sandbox if you like. As a side note, make sure you're only editing using one account. You generally shouldn't be using a second account unless you have a valid reason. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 03:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Question from MayaRubySmith (21:01, 7 May 2025)

How do you suggest I cite a movie credit for my boss without relying on IMDb Pro? --MayaRubySmith (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello MayaRubySmith. You have to be careful when writing about someone you work for because that's a conflict of interest (I see that Knitsey has already offered you some guidance on this). With that said, if you're simply looking to add a citation, I suggest looking for press coverage that verifies the role. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 21:34, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maria das Neves

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maria das Neves you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Johann Voldemar Jannsen at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:15, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maria das Neves

The article Maria das Neves you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maria das Neves for comments about the article, and Talk:Maria das Neves/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 20:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your work on List of pre-Socratic philosophers. Wow! I am very impressed at how well you have filled this content gap. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! I was surprised that we didn't have this already and I've really enjoyed working on it. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 16:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Question from Therian Controls (17:53, 12 May 2025)

How do I publish an article --Therian Controls (talk) 17:53, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Therian Controls! If you want to write an article on Wikipedia, you start by finding reliable sources about the subject you want to write about. Then you can use those to start a draft with the article creation wizard. One important thing is that articles cannot be promotional. The text currently written at User:Therian Controls/sandbox would not be accepted because it describes a product using marketing-like language. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

re-did the page, included devices from the company (based off of the info on their website https://www.bluepointalert.com)

is this better? (due to not a lot of info currently new info might be added by other users if new info is available in the future) Therian Controls (talk) 18:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

I suggest looking at other Wikipedia articles to see how it should be written. You'll want to find sources that are independent of the subject. The guide at WP:42 might help. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jan Brewer

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jan Brewer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jon698 -- Jon698 (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Question from Thabo Clement mokoena (20:28, 13 May 2025)

Hi can you please help me. --Thabo Clement mokoena (talk) 20:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Well, that depends. What do you need help with? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

2023

Did you mean to change pretty much every 2023 to 2023a? DuncanHill (talk) 22:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I added Volume 2 of the same book and wanted to avoid confusing the template by having two books with the same author and year, so I labelled Volume 1 as 2023a and Volume 2 as 2023b per Template:Sfn#More than one work in a year. It's a little more complex with Template:harvc, so I'm open to any other ideas. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Ah OK, it made the article appear in Category:Harv and Sfn template errors and I thought perhaps you had made a slip. Personally I would recommend against shortened citations, they are so terribly error-prone. DuncanHill (talk) 22:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I had missed a few A's, but I found where they were needed. I wish there was something better than shortened citations, but right now the only other realistic option is Template:Rp, which creates a lot of clutter. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Question from Warren Edle (03:21, 17 May 2025)

How do I make a Wikipedia article? --Warren Edle (talk) 03:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Warren Edle, the first thing you want to do is find reliable, independent sources that will be used to get information for the article. Then you can get started by using the article wizard. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 03:24, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Exciting Progress on the POV tag Backlog!

I just finished off the last of the low-hanging fruit in Category:Wikipedia_neutral_point_of_view_disputes_from_December_2019! That means that all the junk tags from before 2020 have been dealt with! Over the coming month or two I plan to take a break from mass-processing of tags and shift to actual content-writing work to fix the tagged articles from pre-2020 that actually still need work. I have also noticed your work addressed POV tags from this year, which has greatly slowed the growth of the backlog, so thank you! -- LWG ^talk 20:10, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Nice! Not counting the subcategory I created for Template:Criticism section (I noticed the process for resolving them is a little different and figured it would help to separate them), it looks like we've removed or resolved roughly 1,500 of them since I joined in about three months ago. I've been leaning toward the content-writing side of things for the older ones, but I also figured that it might help to go to the other end and work backward as well. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:48, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Question from Ultimatelooks4 on Wetsuit (13:43, 21 May 2025)

Hello! I recently created a Wikipedia account and was fortunate to receive an edit opportunity. However, I'm having trouble understanding it clearly. What should I do next to improve it? --Ultimatelooks4 (talk) 13:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Ultimatelooks4, you can edit just about any article on Wikipedia. I suggest getting started at Help:Introduction. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jan Brewer

The article Jan Brewer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jan Brewer for comments about the article, and Talk:Jan Brewer/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jon698 -- Jon698 (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Question from XandarK (19:58, 25 May 2025)

how have you be able to get your edits accepted on wikipedia --XandarK (talk) 19:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello XandarK! Anyone can edit Wikipedia, which means that you can usually edit any article as needed. But this also means that anyone else can challenge or undo your edits. I see that the edit you made to science fantasy was undone by another editor. They added an edit summary to their edit, where they thanked you for helping but pointed out that the part you added was just about one book instead of the entire genre. It can take some time to learn the ins and outs of what to add to an article, so no worries. It looks like they also left a message on your talk page with some helpful links that give you some tips or other helpful resources. Let me know if there's anything else I can help with! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 20:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

The World Destubathon

You are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. It's currently planned for June 16-July 13, partly due to me having hayfever during that period and not wanting to run it throughout July or August in the hotter summer and will be run then unless multiple editors object. There is currently $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. As 250 countries and entities is too much to patrol, entries will be by user, but there is $500 going into prizes for editors covering the most countries. Sign up if interested! ♦ Dr. Blofeld

Unsourced material

Hi, I'm new to editing. I happened upon an article which was almost entirely unsourced, and I had real trouble finding sources for anything (mentioned some specifics in the edit summary). It's entirely possible someone with more skill could find some trustworthy sources to add, but I am left wondering at what point an article does not meet the notability criteria. I have read pages like WP:BEFORE, but without specific examples I am unsure where the line might be (for example, working out whether "uncontroversial deletion" should be used, or whether this article should infact be left as-is, seems hard to work out). Also - anything I have done wrong so far would be great to know and learn from. Thanks! Swiftfall1 (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Swiftfall1! Normally for this type of thing I'd suggest checking for Urdu-language sources and then nominating it for deletion at WP:AfD if those don't exist either. But in this case there's an exemption for populated places. Some editors (including myself) don't like how this exemption works because it results in these types of articles that can't really be improved, but that's the current standard. I've gone ahead and removed the maintenance template requesting a copyedit, since it looks like you fixed that. You can feel free to remove templates like this once whatever problem has been addressed. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:27, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of This Man... This Monster!

The article This Man... This Monster! you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:This Man... This Monster! and Talk:This Man... This Monster!/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 14:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

AfD query

Hi. I'm happy to drop the stick and whatever on this one, but in your opinion, can this AfD that you voted the other day in really be considered no consensus whereas it was a bunch of SPAs voting keep with no policy-based reasoning? In my opinion, you were one of the only people there actually making sense, and I'm honestly a little frustrated. If you think I should let it go, I will. Thanks, MediaKyle (talk) 17:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

MediaKyle, yeah, pretty much any AfD with that much discussion is going to be relisted, even without taking the SPAs into consideration. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 18:25, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. Yes, I had assumed it would be relisted as consensus was still unclear, but it was closed as no consensus. Maybe I was unclear on that point. Is that to be considered an appropriate close? MediaKyle (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Probably not appropriate, you might want to dispute that one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 18:35, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of This Man... This Monster!

The article This Man... This Monster! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:This Man... This Monster! for comments about the article, and Talk:This Man... This Monster!/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 22:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Possible RfC re GA review trading

Hi. I was thinking of posting an RfC related to GA review trading. I saw your comment there which said If there does end up being any RfC, there should be a brief summary of how the review process works and what it's for, for the sake of people who don't regularly participate here.

If you have time, would you mind taking a quick look at the following rough draft of an RfC and let me know what you think? If you don't have time, no worries. Noleander (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Question

Is it permissible for two impartial, experienced GA nominators to exchange reviews on each other's nominations?

What is a GA nomination?

A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, and is broad in coverage. Any significant contributor may nominate the article if they believe it meets the good article criteria. Any impartial editor may review the article from the queue of good article nominations. If it meets the criteria, it is added to the list of good articles.

Terminology

To avoid confusion, please use this terminology in your comments within this RfC:

• "Review Trading" is when a GA nominator asks another nominator to perform reviews on each others' articles. This RfC is addressing Review Trading.

• "Quid pro quo" (qpq) means a DYK-style obligation to perform a review (of any item) in order to nominate an article. That is not a subject of this RfC.

Background

The GA documentation has virtually no discussion of Review Trading: it is neither explicitly prohibited nor explicitly permitted in the GA documentation. Some editors have suggested that "what is not prohibited is permitted". The only place Review Trading is mentioned, I believe, is in the GA Review Circle page, which states: "GARC is not quid pro quo or horse trading arrangement, because those approaches can lead to low-quality reviews, quick approvals, and a culture of complacency."

Review Trading has not been discussed very much in GA Talk pages (contrast with DYK-style qpq, which has been proposed several times over the past 20 years, and always rejected). There is only one significant on Review Trading within GA Talk page discussion in the past ten years: A March 2024 proposal at Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations/Archive_31#Proposal_4:_Formalize_"horse_trading". It was a small discussion, asking if Review Trading should be "formalized", meaning documented as a GA practice. There was 1 Support and 5 Oppose. One Oppose objected to all Review Trading; some Oppose's supported Review Trading, yet objected to making it a formal process. Some of the editors clearly felt that Review Trading was permitted and was occurring.

From several comments throughout the GA talk pages, it is clear that some editors are engaging in Review Trading. I saw mention that some inexperienced editors engaged in Review Trading, resulting in poor-quality GA reviews, and they were discovered and educated (I was not able to find links for those events). Some other experienced editors, who apparently perform good-quality GA reviews, have stated that they engage in Review Trading.

So, it appears that Review Trading is happening to some extent. There are a couple of editors who assert in recent Talk page discussions that Review Trading is not acceptable.

This RfC is asking whether the practice of Review Trading is acceptable for GA nominations, when performed by two experienced, impartial editors. To my knowledge, this question has never been posed before in a RfC or a GA "Proposal".

Asking "Is Review Trading is acceptable?" is not an idle question. For example, I'm working on an article that will be ready for GA nomination in a couple of months from now. I'd like to know if I will be able to reach out to other nominators and ask if they'd like to exchange reviews. Of course, I would only contact editors that are experienced, impartial, and who do thorough, diligent reviews.

(NB: This RfC is not asking if Review Trading should be formally documented in GA instructions ... that was recently discussed in March 2024, and the consensus was "no".) Noleander (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

This is very long, no one is going to read it. Once you have a few sentences, each new sentence is going to increase the number of people who don't read it. And just a heads up, I get a ping every time you edit this. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the tips. Sorry about the excessive pings. Noleander (talk) 17:47, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Bentinho Massaro

What happened there? And why do you hide the truth about your intergalactic conquest? Polygnotus (talk) 22:24, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Indiscriminate criticisms and controversies are not encyclopedic if they don't have any significant bearing on the subject, as described at WP:BALASP. Both also brush against the types of problems that WP:BLPCRIME is meant to address even if they don't explicitly describe criminal charges or liability. Regarding intergalactic conquest, I, uh... don't know what you're talking about. You must have me confused for someone else. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 00:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

An Indiscriminate criticism is something like "all X are Y", like "all politicians are corrupt" which is unfocused. But these statements are pretty damn specific. "This particular person did this and that during this period".

Like "all aliens are big, ugly, and abduct those who disagree with them"...

As all reliable sources have mentioned the accusations, and most have gone pretty in-depth, they meet WP:BALASP, specifically:

An article [snip] should strive to treat each aspect with a weight proportional to its treatment in the body of reliable, published material on the subject

There is no material that suggests Massaro has committed a crime, as far as I know, and being accused of undesirable behaviour is not a crime (otherwise the incarceration rate would be >80%).

I also note that you claim on your userpage to be a life-long resident of Arizona, but isn't it true you spent some years in Nevada? Polygnotus (talk) 01:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

That's not the sense in which I'm using indiscriminate, but I digress. I'd be open to including it if were treated the same way as other information about him, rather than separated from the rest of the content. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 01:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

If you wanna get rid of the section header, sure. But why do you refuse to explain, or even acknowledge, these highly unusual interference patterns on our radio telescope array? Polygnotus (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for Barbara Bush, introduced (in 2023): "Barbara Bush is one of only two women in American history to be both the wife of a U.S. president and the mother of a U.S. president. One of the oldest women to hold the position, she was known for her non-threatening grandmotherly image that earned her some of the highest approval ratings of any contemporary U.S. first lady. She was the last of the first ladies from the Greatest Generation, and as such the last to live the traditional lifestyle of a housewife. Under this lifestyle, she underwent two periods of severe depression: once after the death of her young daughter Robin to leukemia, and once again when her husband's secretive work at the CIA left her in emotional isolation. She held a strong rivalry with her predecessor, Nancy Reagan, and her matronly image forever made her the comparison point for her politically active successor, Hillary Clinton. Besides her widely publicized work in promoting literacy, Bush was also involved in activism for AIDS patients. She died in 2018, shortly after leaving the Republican Party of which she was an icon for much of her life."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Thankyou for getting Barbara's article to be featured! Wonderful work! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Folabiomath (17:17, 8 June 2025)

Hello, Good day. I have been editing the article about African Society for Mathematical Biology. When would it be moved to the main page for public viewing? --Folabiomath (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

It will need to be written in a way that won't be confused with advertising or promotional material. Phrases like "advocates for the professional development of its members while engaging in scientific research and innovation across the continent" sounds like someone talking about what makes ASB great, not a neutral descriptor of its function. The sources need some fixing too. Each source should be used to confirm the information before it. For example, the draft says "In 2010, ASB sought affiliation with the African Mathematical Union (AMU)", but I don't see where the source verifies that; it's just a link to the AMU website. You'll also want to make sure all of the sources you use are independent and reliable. This means sources written by ASB or people associated with it aren't going to be helpful. Wikipedia also can't be used as a source in another Wikipedia article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 17:26, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Ennibrave on Finley Hospital (16:15, 9 June 2025)

Olamide --Ennibrave (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Prathimacuppala (13:38, 11 June 2025)

Hi, Im new to editing in wiki. i made an edit recently in a television show page. there was a random name placed inbetween square brackets next to the names of the contestants. i removed those names and retained the original names and the same was publised. but in my user contribution i have got a (-192) points. why is that? --Prathimacuppala (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Prathimacuppala! That number indicates how much your edit changed the article's size. It's -192, so that means the article is now 192 characters shorter than it was before. Removing bad content can be just as useful as adding good content, the number just makes it easy to see what type of change it was. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 15:49, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

thank you for the clarification. Prathimacuppala (talk) 04:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Cityoforono (17:17, 12 June 2025)

Hi! I am work as the Public Relations for the city of Orono and would like to add more information to my city's page and edit somethings that are very biased towards another city with whom we are working through a conflict, so it reflects the positive changes we have made. My first two edits were reverted, and I would like to know what I need to do to make sure I edit it the right way, so it doesn't get reverted again. Thank you! --Cityoforono (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Cityoforono, it sounds like what you're describing is promotional editing, which is not allowed. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that neutrally documents subjects based on what has been written about them in independent sources. The article can't be written from the perspective of the city, nor can it include original ideas or information that have not already been reported by third parties. You have a conflict of interest, so you may want to read the conflict of interest guide. Assuming that you hold a paid position, you're also required to have a paid-contribution disclosure. Generally speaking, information isn't removed solely because it is negative. This is an aspect of the city that was covered by reliable independent sources, so there's grounds to document it in the article. If you can provide sources such as news coverage to update the information, the conflict of interest guide explains how you can help get the new information into the article alongside the existing information. I see you already have a few sources in the edits you made, so that's a good start. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 18:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You

		Women in Green Editathon May '25
		Thank you for participating in Women in Green's 8th editathon! Your good article about Maria das Neves is another step forward for our coverage of female heads of government. --Grnrchst (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Lolo12345945 (07:10, 17 June 2025)

Hi there, how do I finish off publishing an article? --Lolo12345945 (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

It looks like you did it at Jay Lobwein! In the future, note that it's better to use the "move" button to take it from the draft page to the main page. This avoids having a duplicate where it exists in both the draft and the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 05:16, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

The DCWC is back!

The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle

Hey Thebiguglyalien, the Developing Countries WikiContest will be returning for a second year, and sign-ups are now open! The contest will run from 1 July to 30 September, and the objective remains the same: improve as many articles relating to developing countries as you can to help fight systemic bias on Wikipedia.

In other news, we have a new face on the coordinator team this year: last year's sixth-place finisher, Arconning (talk · contribs)! The coordinators would like to extend a sincere thanks to Ixtal (talk · contribs), who is leaving the team, without whom the contest would not exist. After feedback from contestants last year, the scoring rules are undergoing some modifications; the new rules and a summary of the changes made will be posted to the contest talk page shortly.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or contact one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 09:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Labonham (04:51, 19 June 2025)

Howdy! I may have jumped the gun a little bit with this, but I saw that the title image on the 'Diboll, Texas' page was an aerial view of a town in 1945. Although it's labeled as 'Diboll, Texas,' in the image itself, I noticed that it was actually an aerial view of Lufkin, Texas, which is the next town over. I went ahead and changed it, but do you have suggestions on the 'proper' way to go about editing stuff like this? It's my first time so bear with me! --Labonham (talk) 04:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Labonham! How did you confirm that it's not really Diboll? Assuming you're correct that it was mislabeled, then you made the right call by removing it. I'd also want to head over to Wikimedia Commons where it's hosted to describe the error (otherwise someone might end up adding it back), but we'd need to be able to demonstrate that it was mislabeled. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 05:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Howdy! Thank you for your reply! This is the image I'm referring to: [1]. I initially noticed that it wasn't Diboll when I was comparing the image to other aerial photos of Diboll dated around the 1950s and '60s. The following link contains some of the images I compared it to: [2]. I then recognized some of the features on the original photographs of being in Lufkin, Texas (specifically some of the buildings owned by Lufkin Industries). I compared the image with Lufkin instead of Diboll on Google Maps, Google Earth, as well as the following collection of photographs which contains some aerial photos of Lufkin: [3], and I was able to tell that the image matched Lufkin, not Diboll.

I wish I could upload images of some of the comparisons I made, but I'm still getting used to this site. I hope the links I provided you are able to show that the image isn't correctly labelled. Labonham (talk) 21:37, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm not terribly active at Commons and I'm not super familiar with its inner workings, so I left a message at its Village Pump page to get some input. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I noticed that the image on Commons now has a note mentioning that it is likely a photo of Lufkin, not Diboll. Thanks for your help! Labonham (talk) 05:37, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

No problem! These mentorship module questions are usually the same few things, so it's nice to have a more interesting one from time to time. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 06:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from LLarysaLingva (07:00, 24 June 2025)

Dear Thebiguglyalien, Earlier this spring, I published an article on Ukrainian Wikipedia about a Ukrainian filmmaker. I've now written a shorter English version of the article with the goal of linking it to its Ukrainian counterpart. Could you take a moment to review the draft and let me know if there are any aspects I should revise or improve. Your feedback means a lot. Here is a short link to the article: https://w.wiki/EYg4 Thank you very much in advance for your time and support! regards, LLarysaLingva (talk) 07:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, the English Wikipedia has higher standards for inclusion than many of the others. You'll want to make sure that there are a few reliable sources independent of the subject that provide significant coverage. You'll need at least a few sources like this, and I'm not sure if any of the current sources in the article meet all three of these criteria. User-generated sources like IMDb are unreliable and can't be used in articles at all. Many of the other sources are okay to use but won't count toward proving notability because they're not independent of Naumenko or because they don't give him significant coverage. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Mizusoup (23:47, 24 June 2025)

Hi! I'm writing and editing an article about a living person. I had put all the relevant resources and citations about that person, but it still got rejected. Could you help me with what kind of resources are accepted for the article to get approved? Thanks! --Mizusoup (talk) 23:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Mizusoup, sources have to meet three criteria to prove that someone is notable enough to be included on Wikipedia: they're reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage. IMDb and Wikipedia are user-generated, so they're not published by reliable authors or outlets and should be removed. Things written by Knight, interviews involving her, or pages about her on organizations she's involved with are not independent; they can still be used as sources in some cases, but they don't prove notability. They also need significant coverage, which means that the source provides substantial information about her that isn't just a passing mention or a brief note. An article is only approved if there are multiple sources that meet all of these criteria. Also note that there are additional considerations if you personally know Ivy Knight or are working on her behalf. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 23:57, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Question from Sparrassidae (12:54, 26 June 2025)

hello! I was wondering how to tweak existing links on wikipedia articles as the link on the theridiosomatidae page which should lead to a page on the genus sennin it instead leads to a historical article on xian, and i would like to fix it. --Sparrassidae (talk) 12:54, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Sparrassidae, often you can just open the editor and click to change the link, but in this case the links are wrapped in a template, so you'll have to make sure you're using the source editor (there should be a drop down setting that lets you change between "Visual editing" and "Source editing"). You'll edit the page and find where it says [[Sennin]] and replace it with whatever the correct link is. The brackets tell the page to make it a link. You can check out the Introduction to Wikipedia for the basic pointers on how to edit, and it includes a page specifically about adding links. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 15:30, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2002

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2002 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GoldRomean -- GoldRomean (talk) 01:24, 27 June 2025 (UTC)