User talk:Verraton.Sne

Thanks!

Many thanks for your recent edit to the article, adding some references. I have added archive details to those references, as well as tidying a couple of the parameters.

Adding archive details to references ensures the reference is still usable and useful if the original copy disappears. Good luck with your future editing. -- 89.241.71.114 (talk) 15:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming

iken3.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:14, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs, @medium are not reliable sources

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and I will try to follow your instruction. ::

But as far as I know, Medium has some very famous people (like Barrack Obama, Margaret Atwood, Stacey Abrams) sharing their thought in it. Also, websites like Medium, Quora, LinkedIn has more DA than Wikipedia. I don't know any of these famous people ever wrote on Wikipedia or became its editors.

And honestly, how is Wikipedia is different than "unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight".

Wikipedia itself is a Wiki which happened to be one of the first 'Wikis' in the internet. Wikipedia itself has some articles about its own controversies and there are even more. Wikipedia is just another unreliable sources that you have mentioned. It is used to create circular referencing and to generate traffic for websites, blogs, wikis, etc. Verraton.Sne (talk) 07:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia may not be used as a circular. Your opinions on Wikipedia are noted. You will be blocked if you attempt any more SEO here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:50, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Following your instruction. And thanks for noting my opinion. Verraton.Sne (talk) 13:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful with your references. This reference has nothing to do with Dale, Wisconsin. Furthermore, the only place a clothing brand's "about us" page would be suitable as a source would be on a article about the clothing brand if it was notable. This reference is about a Southgate in the UK, not Michigan. Regarding this edit, other wikis may not be used as sources as they are user-generated content. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning for careless addition of irrelevant references

If you add another reference like this that has nothing to do with the topic, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]