Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AptaBiD
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 05:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- AptaBiD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not appear to be a notable scientific technology. There is only one source, and this appears to be the only scholarly source available. Total GHits when excluding wikipedia total about 19. The phrase "Aptamer-Facilitated Biomarker Discovery" fetches fewer ghits, and the same scholarly source. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 04:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 04:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 04:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Aptamer, still too new for an article of its own, but this is useful material for the more general article. The main article on aptamers does mention AptaBiD, but this could be expanded to a new section on the application of aptamers to cancer cell biology. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, spammy and non-notable. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 04:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Per Tim Vickers ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 07:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as section. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 07:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and remove any spamminess --Orange Mike | Talk 16:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as per above, to new and doesn't imply WP:N yet for it's own article Medicellis (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.