Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aslam
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was revert back to a disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) -- Patchy1 12:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Aslam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is a BLP with no references. It is outside the BLPPROD process because of its date of creation. This AfD nomination is a procedural alternative. It may be closed early once satisfactory references have been provided, or it may run to term at the discretion of the closer. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest Reversion to this version after which the previously sound disambiguation page was hijacked to create this BLP. If the current person happens to be notable that could be split off into Abhishek Venkteshwar or Abhishek Venkteshwar (Aslam) or some such similar name, provided WP:RS citations are added at the same time. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse reversion suggestion above --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.