Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Sleep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 07:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Sleep

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary disambiguation page. Safe to Sleep is the primary topic. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 01:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to delete this. Just redirect it to the primary topic; that would be OK with me. wbm1058 (talk) 01:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Redirect to Safe to Sleep. Most printed material from before 2015 still refers to the SIDS campaign by this name. - CompliantDrone (talk) 02:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Page view stats suggest there is no primary topic. Evidently the Chris Brown song was quite popular. older ≠ wiser 10:22, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a couple of minor entries. — Gorthian (talk) 06:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.