Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddy (software)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Buddy (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely promotional Amigao (talk) 00:59, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete is most appropriate here (or userfy with complete rewrite and new sourcing): I agree with the OP. This article, especially the configuration and version control sections read as promotional and violates WP:RSPX due to having two Twitter references. I don't know anything about this software, however this article likely needs a swift return to userspace or failing that, deletion. 11WB (talk) 01:14, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Didn't found significant coverage about the topic to justify it's notability. I barely see the coverage about the topic. Fade258 (talk) 06:48, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Poorly referenced, WP:GNG is not clear. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:41, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.