Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cdigix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 02:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cdigix

Putting this up for deletion as advertising. Article does not appear to claim notability as per WP:WEB, but I'm bringing this to AfD to allow debate on this point (so that would be a delete from me unless convinced otherwise). Petros471 22:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to gather more votes. JIP | Talk 06:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like advertising to me. Ehurtley 08:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ummm...weak keep if rewritten so as not to look like an ad, and if some citations are provided to substantiate their claims. Duke University and 50 campuses subscribing to the service may indicate that there's more to this than some start-up trying to get their name out. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 11:39, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes both WP:WEB and the mor appro WP:CORP as there are numerous newspaper articles which have the company as a subject - most of which appear to be non-press releases [1]. Seems to meet the common sense criteria as well (per Mr. Bugwit). Kuru ^talk 05:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, it really, really needs to be translated away from "ad-speak". Kuru ^talk 05:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Kuru. Cleanup appears to have progressed already. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 00:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.