Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 05:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Centr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, I'm not finding sources to back up that this band passes GNG. This is a Russian band so there may be sources in that language however I do not speak it. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • But I didn't do anything. I just sourced several sentences, proved notability and was hoping the author improves/rewrites it. I'm not sure what I can do. Because the article is largely unsourced and it would take forever to source it. Because I proposed to cut it down, but I think I don't really want to delete most of it. It looks like the article was translated from the Russian Wikipedia. The Russian article is also largely unsourced, but it looks like some people look after it. So all/most of the facts are probably correct... --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just mean that the sources you added (in my view) were enough for the subject to meet the threshold of notability. The article still needs more work (and sources) but its enough to move on from this AFD (I think, and so does the nom from the looks of it). Stalwart111 03:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.