Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Configuron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Configuron

Configuron: a neologism that gives undue weight to one particular point of vue.

Result of a search with Google Scholar:

only 24 hits
2 hits, among them the most cited one, are off-topic
21 are from no more than two different authors, Angell and Ozhovan/Ojovan

Conclusion: despite obstinate efforts by its two main proponents, this neoglogism has failed to enter the scientific mainstream. -- Paula Pilcher (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism lacking independent sources to make it notable. May mention a sentence or two at glass transition but not an article or even a redirect. Qwfp (talk) 17:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Beside lack of notability, I do not find useful information there: first half tells obvious things, which are not specific to this article, second one introduces a concept, whose merit is neither justified not clear. Materialscientist (talk) 12:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.