Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corentin Rahier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. I'm going to note for the record here that "the subject seems familiar" was not factored into this close as that is not in any way a valid argument to keep an article. If this hadn't already been relisted twice I would have done that instead. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Corentin Rahier

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Skating, and France. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The one secondary source already in the article (source 2) combined with [[1]] and [[2]] appear to contain enough coverage of Rahier to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that the 2017 Junior Worlds Field Guide: Ice Dance article is from a blog site run by a single person. As such it is most likely not deemed a reliable source per WP:SPORTBASIC. The other two sources look okay at a glance. Alvaldi (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch there. Let'srun (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: The subject seems familiar, I suggest the article be worked on instead given the references provided by Liz

Cameremote, I don't know what you are talking about, I didn't provide any references, I just relisted this discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The subject seems to be familiar to me. KOLANO12 3 17:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kolano123, the subject "seeming" to be familiar is not a reason for Keeping an article. This is also what Cameremote stated. What did you think of the sourcing? Did you search for any additional sources? If you are not going to spend time investigating the article and its sources, please do not comment. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. The only sources are blogs and a few passing mentions. Whether it sounds familiar to some people is irrelevant. BilletsMauves^€500 11:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.