Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyclone (Robotech)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Robotech vehicles. MBisanz ^talk 03:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone (Robotech)

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series. Without non-trivial coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- TTN (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Exactly as TTN said this is plot summary and original research. The only references are from Robotech.com It's just a fictional item with no notability outside the Robotech world. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/create to a list of Robotech vehicles 70.55.200.131 (talk) 09:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per 70.55.200.131. Edward321 (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And why such a list would be useful and notable? According to WP:WAF: Very rarely should such spinout articles be about a singular topic (e.g., character, plot item); either that topic has demonstrated its own notability, or should be merged into the main article or existing spinout articles. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into new list of Robotech Equipment/Mecha. The equipment/mecha of the series/manga Robotech do have significant third part coverage, and the cyclone in particular (http://news.google.com/news?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&hl=en&q=robotech+mecha&ie=UTF-8), and in general (http://news.google.com/archivesearch?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&hl=en&q=robotech+mecha&ie=UTF-8), so I do recommend a complete list made, but not singular articles for each. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 13:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Partial merge. A lot of this stuff is too trivial/non-notable to be worth including anywhere in Wikipedia. That which is notable should be merged elsewhere as it certainly does not deserve its own article. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:12, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As not notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.