Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D Fun Pak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per no actual input regarding the album's notability or lack thereof in the discussion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

D Fun Pak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. » Shadowowl | talk 21:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - No reason given by nominator for why the article fails WP:NALBUM. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 13:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion would violate ATD, PRESERVE and R because the band has an article to which this could be merged and redirected. No comment on notability at this time. James500 (talk) 15:07, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Close due to insufficient reasoning from the nominator. If anyone else thinks the album is non-notable, they can start a new AfD and do it correctly. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
IGNORE ABOVE VOTE let consensus decide, not your personal opinion. » Shadowowl | talk 20:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.