Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dendemann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mango juice^talk 14:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dendemann

This artist fails WP:MUSIC and lacks non-trivial coverage by third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 01:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment looks like the article content substantially mirrors the de.wikipedia entry, which seems to have more sources. Can someone who reads German examine those references and comment on their independence and reliability? Jclemens (talk) 04:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Zero references, which is not good, however appears to satisfy WP:MUSIC and there is sufficient evidence to suggest deficiencies can be addressed. dr.ef.tymac (talk) 02:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What evidence are you referring to? This article currently fails WP:BLP and basic verifiability policy. I'm not sure how WP:MUSIC can be met when those overriding policies are currently not. JBsupreme (talk) 04:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC & WP:BLP. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 08:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails the everything test with an added emphasis on WP:BLP and core verifiability policy. RFerreira (talk) 19:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, because he had 2 charting singles and 1 charting album in Germany (and propably two albums soon, he is going to release a live album on friday). Being listed on de:laut.de is considered at least a hint at some established notability in the German Wikipedia (see de:Wikipedia:Relevanzkriterien#Pop- und Rockmusik). There also is a biography on all music guide. The other sources in the German article are just some interviews and album reviews, nothing I would call independent and reliable. His charts positions can be confirmed here. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 12:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.