Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct 8
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →Bmusician 03:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Direct 8 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is unsourced article about a commercial entity. Notablity has never been demonstrated not is tis article sourced . Since its creation it has no significant content . It has required ongoing maintenance work as well as a CPVIO involvements in its history. Its inclusion is considered more harmful than beneficial and the AdF request - with a speedy prejedice BO; talk 14:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, per WP:SNOW and lack of WP:BEFORE. Multiple easy-to-find significant secondary sources: Le Parisien, 20 Minutes, Le Figaro, Le Point, La Croix... Cavarrone (talk) 15:09, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Reliable secondary sources are available that are comprised of significant coverage about the topic. Also, importantly, per WP:NRVE, ..."The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable." See also: WP:IMPERFECT, "Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required." Northamerica1000(talk) 01:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Significant coverage shown by Cavarrone. SL93 (talk) 01:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Some sources:
- (in French) Direct 8 devient une « vraie » concurrente
- (in French) Direct 8, Nicolas, les femmes et le coup de ciseau - 20minutes.fr
- (in French) Direct 8 s'offre l'équipe de France Espoirs, actualité Médias 2.0 : Le Point
- (in French) Direct 8 : la chaîne du direct - télévision - la-Croix.com
- (in French) Programmes TV - «Direct 8 est devenue un média de masse» - Divertissement - Le Figaro TV
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.