Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disability Challengers
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Disability Challengers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't find any sources about this organisation apart from some mentions and local coverage. Sam Walton (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete simply because my searches found nothing good at all. SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete not a notable subject. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- DElete -- It may be locally significant in Surrey; possibly also Hampshire or part of it, but I do not think it meets notability guidelines. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.