Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream transference

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn Fences&Windows 23:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dream transference

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the unreliable source currently used as reference 2, I cannot find support for this being a notable phenomenon in studies of the paranormal.

The article further appears to conflate the idea of a dream transferring to another person with the psychoanalytical concept of Transference in relation to dreaming.

I don't think that there is anything salvagable here. Fences&Windows 02:07, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Shared dreaming--Coin945 (talk) 04:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this, Oneironautics#Within_the_dream_of_another and Shared dreaming into the most common research term for the subject, Dream telepathy (currently a redirect to this article). My comments from a similar AfD are still revelant: "notable both in old and new mainstream fiction and as a parapsychological field of study, with plenty of coverage by prominent researchers and authors - Montague Ullman, Stanley Krippner, Stephen LaBerge, Keith Hearne, Patricia Garfield and so on. WP:Potential very much applies." K2709 (talk) 20:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree--Coin945 (talk) 02:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.