Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ElDeyma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ElDeyma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. Sources are all Facebook or Youtube bar the odd appearance on a self-published compilation and a local radio station. Absolutely nothing else in the way of reliable sources out there. Has already been speedied once as El Deyma. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything that even implies that this group meets WP:BAND. Delete. (To save other editors the trouble of wading through it all, the closest thing to a usable source given is the Phoenix FM piece.) —Cryptic 17:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a charitable person, and wading in with a WP:CSD#A7 blunderbuss gives WP:GARAGE band writers the feeling we're all horrible ogres who delete stuff. While I optimistically hope the 7 days' grace for an AfD is enough to either salvage the article, or convince the creator there's no real benefit to having it. Either way, it's a better option. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.