Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epydoc
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Epydoc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT Clenpr (talk) 16:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).
- --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Old and now defunct software for generating documentation in python. Available sources are mostly primary (2004 presentation at Pycon, software website). Most detailed additional mention I can find is in a bachelor's thesis from 2019 which does not meet GNG/reliability guidelines. Other sources are passing mentions or brief descriptions.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:28, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.