Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euthymophobia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete. Already deleted by Werdna. (non admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Euthymophobia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Upon web searches, it seems to be original research. The outro looks spam-ish; not sure if this is an alright article, so I'm taking this to AfD. SchfiftyThree (talk!) 00:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "I wanted to share with you an idea I have been working on for probably 20 years" is a clear admission that this is original research. No sources Beeblebrox (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Extremely strong delete per Wikipedia:NOR FlyingToaster 00:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete even if we forget this OR, the article still isn't viable. After searching Google, Pubmed and both the paper and digital publications of my university library, I found absolutely nothing. - Mgm|(talk) 00:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedily deleted. — Werdna • talk 00:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.