Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ExR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ExR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One blog, one youtube link, no reliable sources or evidence of notability (and, alas, very hard to Google for same because there are about a million things called EXR) Pinkbeast (talk) 12:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you try tapping in "Etta Bond Raf Riley Exr"? Chucks out 6,860 results in Google and 20,200 results in Bing. Regardless, keep per WP:BAND criterion #6a. Djunbalanced, what do you think?--Laun chba ller 14:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the artists have done enough as a duo to be included as a separate article. They've also played/been scheduled to play main stage at several major UK festivals including Global Gathering, Reading, Leeds and Wireless. At the moment there's a lot about ExR on Odd Child, but it would be better placed in either a separate article for the record label or an article for the duo. It's not logical to have it all down under Labrinth. --DJUnBalanced (talk) 15:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I was mistaken. I've no complaint if proper sources can be found. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've incorporated the four Djunbalanced put here.--Laun chba ller 22:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.