Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FFAStrans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FFAStrans

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable software/tool. No coverage anywhere. Praxidicae (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Shellwood: Software for broadcasters is in deed special interest and from perspective of the WWW most of it is not "noteable". It is my believe that in the area where this tool plays, it is in deed noteable due to it's number of forum topics. It is mentioned in all relevant "noteable" relavant, independent forums like Doom9 and such (do you need more info on that?) Please know that i am not affiliated with the software owner Emcodem (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Emcodem: No idea, how about asking the user who nominated the article for deletion instead? Shellwood (talk) 07:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Being new here is sometimes not so easy :-) I was working through the new article guidelines now and before and it seems to be a matter of discussion. This software has a couple of hundred or even thousand users according to their forum, also please read my wrongly placed reply to Shellwood above. Thanks for taking the time! Emcodem

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 01:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG. Can't find any independent sources that cover the subject Bait30 ^Talk? 03:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete found passing mention, otherwise no other RS. – UnnamedUser (talk; contribs) 20:42, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.