Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GitLab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GitLab

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Original concern was that there were no reliable sources that supported notability. Editor who disputed PROD felt that this reference established notablity, as it was ranked in the top 50 in popularity by that website. However, I do not see how this meets the general notability guidelines. ~~WP:POPULARPAGE applies here.~~ Singularity42 (talk) 02:50, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Stuck some of my comments after realizing I misread what was being said. Singularity42 (talk) 12:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I cannot find any reliable secondary sources denoting it's notability. Tek022 | _Comments? 07:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GitLab is mentioned on the Turnkey Linux website and is the basis for a CS students' progress tracking system in this peer reviewed paper. The first is marginally in depth and second is not in depth. These sources are not quite enough to satisfy notability guidelines WP:GNG for multiple in-depth reliable sources. This is a relatively new system and my opinion is that this is a case of WP:TOOSOON; not enough time has passed for coverage by secondary reliable sources to accumulate. Without sufficient reliable sources, this suggests deletion, with no prejudice to re-creation if/when more reliable sources become available. If other sources are found, I'd be happy to change my recommendation. --Mark viking (talk) 16:45, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.