Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inner alignment
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Inner alignment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not currently cite reliable sources. Current citations include the forums "LessWrong" and "AI Alignment Forum", and blog articles on "AISafety.info", Medium, and LinkedIn. A web search turned up the following primary source articles:
- Li et al., "Alleviating Action Hallucination for LLM-based Embodied Agents via Inner and Outer Alignment," PRAI 2024
- Melo et al., "Machines that halt resolve the undecidability of artificial intelligence alignment", Sci. Rep. 2025
- Safron et al., "Value Cores for Inner and Outer Alignment", IWAI 2022
I am recommending this article for deletion since I could find no references to this concept in reliable secondary sources. Elestrophe (talk) 01:40, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: This concept seems to exist and be a confounding factor in artificial intelligence spaces, and therefore has some value to the overall encyclopedia. Because AI is advancing at such a rate, and because such advancements raise challenges faster than scientific study of those challenges can be adequately conducted, I would argue that there is some limited room for article creation before full adequate sourcing exists. There is a fine line between what I am talking about and a violation of WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:NOR; but I would raise that it is better to have an article in this case than not have an article. Foxtrot620 (talk) 18:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - this is a notable concept. I just added a reference to the article from Scientific Reports. A Google Scholar search for
"inner alignment" artificial intelligence
turns up 300+ results. Many are preprints but there remain many peer-reviewed papers and books. Books, too. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 20:43, 25 June 2025 (UTC)