Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IrishJack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IrishJack

This article has been tagged for cleanup for more than a year, but in that time, no verifiable references have been provided to indicate that the breed is notable. I recommend a delete rather than a merge to Jack Russell Terrier unless some reliable source can be located to establish that this is a recognized variety, and not just marketing on behalf of one or several kennels. Shunpiker (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 01:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The original nomination was complete. -- Shunpiker (talk) 17:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no references and there is some evidence (Talk:IrishJack) that the whole (WP:OR?) thing has got a bit confused. Plus an edit summary suggesting it's a trademark. Without sources (and the key contributors don't seem to be active on WP anymore), this can't be sorted. Rd232 ^talk 18:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; that was my edit summary expressing concern about it being a one-kennel breed. I never did/still don't have time to try to sort this out. Elf | Talk 23:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.