Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Cass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jen Cass

A few claims here and there, a few notable awards and a primary source, and some news reviews mentioned. However, it reads as a big PR piece and I can't find any secondary sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: According to the talk page it was written by her publicist. No secondary sources available (fails WP:V). BradV 14:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 22:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. WP:MUSIC does say "Has had a charted hit on any national music chart", and the article mentions one of her songs being on the National Folk Chart. Nonetheless, article is very poorly written and needs cleanup. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 22:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As the nominator himself says, "A few notable awards" DGG (talk) 23:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep article desperately needs rewriting for a more neutral encyclopedic tone as well as some reliable 3rd party sources in the reference section. Also need to address the possible copyvio thing (confirming the permission from the talkpage I suppose). She does have 63 GNews hits though and some sourcing for the awards when "Jen Cass" USA songwriting award is searched. Interesting to me was this link [1] simply because it includes another person up for deletion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs a lot of work, but the awards indicate notability, and the following coverage was easily found on Google: [2], [3], [4].--Michig (talk) 18:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.