Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logelloop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logelloop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to convey notability of this software per the criteria at WP:NSOFTWARE. I can find no references to this product in any research papers; best I can find generally is this article on a French site which I'm unconvinced is sufficient to meet our notability threshold. Article appears to have been written by the product's creator. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator, and pinging author Philippe Ollivier for comment, along with Hermera34 who originally tagged for speedy deletion, Adam9007 and Mike Rosoft who applied maintenance tags. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I removed the A7 tag because it doesn't apply; this article is about a piece of software, not the company that made it. I don't know why, but this seems to confuse a lot of people. Adam9007 (talk) 18:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Adam9007: just for the record, I completely agree with your actions — this article is not eligible for deletion under CSD A7, hence I've now brought it to AfD. I pinged you only in case you wanted to comment on the deletion discussion, and for completeness, given there's only been 4 contributors to the article. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 18:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - @UkPaolo: That's nice to know, especially as I recently had a lot of hoo-ha about my interpretation and application of A7! Adam9007 (talk) 18:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
--Philippe Ollivier (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Philippe Ollivier left a blank comment on this page, and the following on my talk page [1], which as a courtesy I'll copy below, since it's relevant to this discussion. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 19:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am one of the Logelloop developers and the writer of the article on Logelloop. The base of my article is : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinberg_Cubase I mean, I just want to make an article in the same style as as articles about other softwares on Wikipedia.
You'll also find some other articles on audio software as Ableton Live : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ableton_Live and I think Logelloop, as a real time looping software, may have an article in Wikipedia.
This article is useful to make link for some pages related to audio looping (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_(music), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_looping)
If you think that this article is not useful on Wikipedia, please delete it. Thank you very much, best regards, Philippe Ollivier
— Philippe Ollivier (talk · contribs), [2]

Comment Per the author of this article, sounds like this is a conflict of interest and is strongly discouraged. Perhaps the article should be tagged with the COI tag while this is being discussed. Hermera34 (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have checked the references in the article, but the only useful things I have found at the websites are an interview with the author, and a comparison chart (with descriptions apparently copied straight from the authors). Google search didn't return anything much better. I'm afraid it's a delete from me. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not yet any signs of a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apart from book, newspaper and other archives, I have searched my university's repository. Found nothing but the link noted by the deletion requesting editor. I have read the general notability guidelines. I do not know if any specific guidelines exist for software. If there are, please guide me. Based on my assessment, this article should be deleted. Xender Lourdes (talk) 04:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Xender Lourdes: see WP:NSOFTWARE for our software-specific notability guidelines. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 06:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.