Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loose Logic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MuZemike 22:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Logic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all the criteria at WP:NM and a clear COI. It had been deleted as a prod but the artist himself requested it be remade. Wikipedia is not free webspace. Pentadecimal (talk) 14:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: I deleted (and undeleted) the PROD, and had been meaning to start this discussion with the undeletion, but was called away from the computer. I don't see any evidence of notability, but I'd certainly be fine with keeping the article if someone can find some decent sources. {{Nihiltres|talk|edits}} 14:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and for the record, a conflict of interest (COI) is not clear here: the main contributions that suggest COI are those of User:Looselogic, whose main contributions were to add images that were later deleted. That the subject requested undeletion is trivial, as it doesn't directly impact the article's content or ultimately, state of existence. I don't think that any COI should be a significant reason for deletion here. {{Nihiltres|talk|edits}} 15:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:11, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i have supplied some links to start off with.. and will search for more.. in the next few months there will be a large amount of external mentions in print/web media and i will make sure to add the links here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.124.173 (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep When this AfD began, this rapper's notability was extremely doubtful. Now I would call this a borderline case, given the external links since added to the page (eventually someone will have to wikify the article). The article is badly in need of a rewrite, but I think its subject might be just notable enough for inclusion. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.