Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meaningless statement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sandstein 20:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meaningless statement

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wholly unsourced, was recently moved from draft without improvement. Fails WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY. UtherSRG (talk) 11:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 11:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is from a different age. Over 20 years ago. If memory serves my single source for what is clearly a personal coinage by David Hackett Fischer in his tome Historians Fallacies Toward a Logic of Historical Thought and with hindsight is too novel a concept for a General Encyclopedia. O, and if there is some faux pas in how I have formatted my view, edit freely. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 12:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. I had mistakenly Prodded the article because I missed that it was undeleted and not eligible.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.