Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model Context Protocol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 09:47, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Model Context Protocol

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article consists of mostly machine-generated text, was not disclosed as being machine-generated when published by the page creator and there are multiple drafts for the same subject (Model Context Protocol, Model Context Protocol 1, Model Context Protocol (MCP)). LemurianPatriot (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. LemurianPatriot (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Thanks for the review. It's not perfect, but still the most in-depth version compared to the competing drafts and even more comprehensive than the Chinese counterpart of the same Wikipedia article on the Model Context Protocol: https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E6%A8%A1%E5%9E%8B%E4%B8%8A%E4%B8%8B%E6%96%87%E5%8D%8F%E8%AE%AE

It has reached a critical point of notability with OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google DeepMind's Gemini supporting it. Feel free to edit it to improve it! Canp (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe parts to rework or to delete, but please keep the article, since relevant and MCP has some momentum, see e.g. InfoQ (Professional Software Development) article https://www.infoq.com/news/2025/04/fastapi-mcp/. Mywikie (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's important that Wikipedia has a page for MCP since loads of people, including me, will be searching for info and LLMs aren't trained with data new enough. 80.221.185.118 (talk) 08:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (with revisions) per Canp. The coverage/adoption in the past month ([1], [2]) is enough for this to be on Wikipedia somewhere; I can't think of a redirect target. Neutral or possibly supportive of a full swap with Draft:Model Context Protocol, which is less LLM-generated. 65.144.53.2 (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
keep sorry I am not logged in. I am an old Wikipedia editor ( but on my phone). I came to Wikipedia specifically for an article about this topic which I am glad to read! This should not be merged with another article... This is a topic on its own ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.202.90.212 (talk) 21:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No support for deletion beyond nominator, but without P&G-based !votes this discussion thus far it would be good to hear from some AfD regulars.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:20, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Relatively new but quite significant development in machine learning. Plenty of good sources available. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While there are many articles and blog pages, I purposly added wikipedia to my search term to day to find this page. while always ways to improve, I believe the topic is gaining traction and is important. Tharple ^Talk 18:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As much as I love deleting articles for Wikipedia:TOOSOON, this is so obviously a notable topic and space that receives intense academic and press coverage. We're better off improving the article instead of deleting it and being back in the same place in a month. Brandon (talk) 23:37, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A new topic, but an important one.Jan Spousta (talk) 09:19, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cleanup yes, delete no - WP:SURMOUNTABLE. Would be good to merge goodness from draft(s). Widefox; talk 20:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a pretty notable thing and, like others have said, I cannot think of a viable redirect here. There are also some good sources to support it. I also think this draft is a better written version of the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Model_Context_Protocol Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 20:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.