Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiphase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiphase

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Solution looking for a problem. Similar to thermomagnetic, "multiphase" is an partial-title match and thus not a valid dab. Primefac (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are at least two major contexts for this – multiphase flow and multiphase power. There are other synonyms around too like polyphase and so readers may need help in finding their way. Andrew D. (talk) 18:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - another sensible and useful dab page. No reason to delete any of them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 21:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.