Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NetShade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. L Faraone 00:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NetShade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NN product. No g-news hits, only primary sources, download hosts, product directory, git, etc.. Failed {{prod}} with sole author's objection. Toddst1 (talk) 05:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unreferenced, no indication of notability; created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 13:15, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:00, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: Per [1], [2], and [3]. SL93 (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. References above prove existence, not notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 20:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 15:01, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: I have added a reference [4]. benzband (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.