Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PBot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a non-notable game that used to be run on a chat network. Tagged as unsourced for over one year, plenty of time to add sources by the authors or maintainers. Typical source check does not reveal anything usable. Miami33139 (talk) 17:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added references. The bot has been used for 10 years and had a waiting queue for players who wanted to play (this is to mention how popular it was). I wouldn't call it "non-notable". Ok, it wasn't as popular as Doom was, but still... -- Lyverbe (talk) 18:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for adding sources. The article needs to meet the Wikipedia Notability criteria. Adding sources from blogs and personal websites does not meet that criteria. Miami33139 (talk) 22:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added references. The bot has been used for 10 years and had a waiting queue for players who wanted to play (this is to mention how popular it was). I wouldn't call it "non-notable". Ok, it wasn't as popular as Doom was, but still... -- Lyverbe (talk) 18:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What next Miami? Are you going to AfD IRC poker now too? Why do you insist on pulling this stuff out of my contribs? --Tothwolf (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Subject of the article lacks reliable coverage from third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 18:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I do not have time to reread WP instructions, but I believe PBot was deleted wrong. techtonik (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]