Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power, Profit and Protest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 07:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Power, Profit and Protest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete per WP:NB -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Please be more specific. Which section(s) of WP:NB do you have in mind?
- —Wavelength (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The spirit of the guideline applies. The article may pass muster on criteria #1 but it would depend on the interpretation of "multiple". -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If the three references in the article are insufficient for criterion #1, then perhaps these three additional references are sufficient to rectify that deficiency.
- Power, profit and protest : Australian social movements and globalisation / Verity Burgmann - Details - Trove
- Informit - Labour History - Verity Burgmann, Power, Profit and Protest : Australian Social Movements and Globalisation [Book Review] (Business Collection)
- O'Hara on Burgmann Power, profit and protest
- —Wavelength (talk) 01:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If the three references in the article are insufficient for criterion #1, then perhaps these three additional references are sufficient to rectify that deficiency.
- Keep. The article is well-referenced, so the book is notable.—Wavelength (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC) and 19:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:22, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Here are some more sources:
- Fighting for the Forests. Ron Chapman (PhD) 2008, p18. (shows use in research)
- The workers' flag is deepest green. Jeff Sparrow. Seminar, Australian National University, October 2004. (shows use in teaching)
- David Sprigg (shows use in social policy research)
- Book review in Australian Journal of Politics and History Volume 50, Issue 1, pages 123-154, March 2004. (ref) Cathie Jensen-Lee writes "This book provides an interesting and thoughtful analysis of several movements for change in Australian society; namely the Aboriginal movement, the women's movement, the green movement and the anti-capitalist/anti-corporate globalisation movements."
- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Plenty of sources support notability, per User:Wavelength and User:Chiswick Chap. Johnfos (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.