Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Kill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by OP. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein ^talk 05:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Project Kill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are 6 listed citations available here [[1]], did any of them get looked at for possible notability support? Donaldd23 (talk) 00:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, looking through what's available online makes me believe that there must be 1970s newspaper sources (at least from Kentucky) to verify the contents against RS. Indeed the film may be a bit obscure but as there are no good redirect targets, I would favour a standalone article. I don't see how we could not cover a major film that had Leslie Nielsen and Nancy Kwan in it. —Kusma (t·c) 18:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If an administrator is willing to vote Keep for this, then I withdraw this nomination. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hitcher vs. Candyman, that I am an admin does not make my opinion more important here, so please don't read too much into that. I totally agree that the article needs better sources (and I think a couple of days in a good library would provide those), but I don't think deleting this article helps. —Kusma (t·c) 10:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.