Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RIXC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn‎. (non-admin closure) Aintabli (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RIXC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any independent RS for this. There is barely any coverage. Likewise, the article stayed unsourced for 16 years! Aintabli (talk) 05:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator as several sources have been found. I did try for Latvian sources, however, it was to no success. Likewise, the "duck duck go" search (link below) barely returns anything in my case. Aintabli (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Aintabli (talk) 05:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment a search in Latvian (a language I unfortunately cannot read) brings up:
- a review of the RIXC Festival of Arts and Sciences, including articles for the 2023, 2021 and 2018 editions
- an interview to the founders

And several more results (here's what I searched for). Aintabli did you search in Latvian as part of WP:BEFORE? Broc (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This book ISBN 978-3-86588-253-0 has seemingly a 2-pages description of the RIXC (per table of content), but I have no access to it. Broc (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to a full Keep after finding mentions of RIXC projects even in English books, such as [1] Broc (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then again, it seems the foundational edit was a copyvio, see this book from 2003 at page 277 (probably not the original source) [2] Broc (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.