Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rephormula
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rephormula (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable re-released of a previously released album. Fails WP:Music Azviz (talk) 03:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:08, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but re-name to Phormula. Easily meets WP:MUSIC; album by a notable band on a notable label, with sources. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for reasons given above, with thanks to Cannibaloki for their good work. Drmies (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a case to speedy keep? Cannibaloki 17:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.