Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retecool
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Navou banter 22:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
disputed PROD for NN-blog. delete Cornell Rockey 02:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would require a major re-write. Reads like an ad to me.Navou banter 03:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Has been rewritten and expanded since nomination. Navou banter 00:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article is a translation of the Dutch Wikipedia article and shows multiple outside coverage in independent and reliable sources. The article could do with some clean-up, but that is no ground for deletion. AecisBravado 21:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've tried to clean up the article and some of the pov language and translation problems, added some assertions of notability (like being the fourth largest blog in the Netherlands atm), fixed the references, etc. AecisBravado 21:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 00:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. Won a notable and independent award and article cites non-trivial mentions in news media. --JaimeLesMaths (talk!edits) 01:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup (sectioning). The site definitely appears to be notable (due to national recognition) but I think it needs to be expanded and sectioned to make the information it presents easier to read. ◄Zahakiel► 01:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and further clean notable national blog TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 02:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I Googled it and it is definitely notable. Jeepday 05:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article would not some cleanup as mentioned by users above but it is notable though. Tellyaddict 15:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.