Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodgen Stewart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rodgen Stewart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Mathonius (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think article Rodgen Stewart should be deleted because

all the information in it is valid to my knowledge --86.135.133.39 (talk) 11:09, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This post misplaced at the bottom of the daily log and moved here. Dru of Id (talk) 13:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC) [reply]

I do not think Article Rodgen Stewart should be deleted because the information in it is valid to my knowledge — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.133.39 (talk) 11:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree totally, There is no need to delete it please, please could you just point out parts that needs changing and i will edit it?

Bury times article

If you need more news etc please let me know

Thanks

--John Johnson (talk) 11:26, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE MADE SOME CHANGES TO THE ARTICLE , I HOPE THIS IS ENOUGH TO FIT IN THE GUIDELINES AND POLICIES. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THIS IS ENOUGH OR IF I NEED TO DO MORE EDITS.

--John Johnson (talk) 12:36, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Unsigned act. A couple of trivial mentions in local paper about performing as an Elvis tribute act. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per arguments of Escape Orbit. Yworo (talk) 14:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have done all I can to make make this article the best I can and I just keep getting faults. It would be helpful to help me edit the article the right way because when I read the guidelines I cannot understand It.

--John Johnson (talk) 16:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Totally fails to display any notability associated with musicians in Wikipedia; indeed, the article even says so ("Stewart is currently not signed to any record deals."). Stewart has a commendable charity fund raising history, but this, in itself is not remarkable - so do thousands and thousands of other young people. The "Early life and education" section is totally unremarkable. The "Career" section contains nothing of note. The only possible item of interest is that he "was originally born in Jamaica": now, if we could establish that he had subsequent births in other places there would certainly be a need for an article, but I suspec this is just careless writing! Emeraude (talk) 17:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Article was created and the main contributor by far has been User:Rodgenss, who we must assume is the subject of the article. He is also the John Johnson who has contributed to this AfD. He has made no edits to any other articles. Emeraude (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I think that local news articles usually don't show notability and those local sources have sparse content. SL93 (talk) 00:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks significant coverage in reliable sources and fits no criterion of WP:MUSICBIO. Hekerui (talk) 08:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have my permission to delete the article. Im through with wikipedia

--John Johnson (talk) 02:18, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.