Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints in Methodism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. This has been around quite long enough given there is not even a single argument for deletion. Bduke (Discussion) 06:22, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saints in Methodism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alleged to be a POV fork: "This article is "forced" as a result of rejection of the notion in article United Methodist Church." Posted as a courtesy on behalf of User:Afaprof01 who misfiled this at MfD. I remain neutral. Gigs (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dedcided to make this page to add more information, since it shouldn't be included within the page Methodism, similar to the page Saints in Anglicanism. User:Tarheelz123 01:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems okay to me other than needing some formatting and editing. What's the problem? ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No solid reason given to delete. No prej. to being re-nommed in the future for a valid deletion guideline. youngamerican (wtf?) 15:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.