Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayed Haider

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - No valid reason has been given for deletion and nope "notability" isn't a valid reason in the slightest, No objections to speedy renomination (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sayed Haider

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 16:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Both the Ekushey Padak award & his involvement in designing the Shaheed Minar, Dhaka appear notable. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep,Ekushey Padak award and his role in the contruction of the first Shaheed Minar, Dhaka establishes notability.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:ANYBIO criterion #1. Worldbruce (talk) 19:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Winning Ekushey Padak is a huge feat. ~Altaf~ (talk) 22:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Surely a deletion discussion with such an inadequate explanation of the reason for deletion should be speedily closed? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.